b7f2bcc3   
   From: dahoov2@cox.net   
      
   I would love to see  Peter do an area on his site like Anthony Daniels   
   has.  I will email him later to tell him it's a great idea.  yes,   
   something is definately amiss with the signatures (plural) on that   
   photo; on that you have my consensus.  Peter's actually looks the   
   beest on there followed by Carrie but they are all a bit odd aren't   
   they?  The Hamill and Ford are horrible I'll say.  i'd not buy it.   
   And if by chance we are all wrong about this not looking good and it   
   IS good, I still would never buy it.  There's a such thing as legit   
   sigs run amuck... not legible and worth the money and for 349.00 this   
   isn't worth 1/4 of the money.   
      
   Sorry Strickler; it pains me so very much to agree with Barefoot. You   
   know I can't do it... but that's horrible and if Peter says his sig is   
   bad too (that would be the one I'd  be on the fence about the most),   
   then it's a bad thing and I hope you don't continue to sell it.   
      
      
      
   On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:58:31 -0700 (PDT), barefoot   
    wrote:   
      
   >today i was told by peter mayhew's wife and son in low that this item   
   >is not really signed by peter...they are considering making a "dark   
   >side" section to their website like anthony daniels and told me they   
   >are glad that i brought this to their attention.   
   >maybe you can shed some light on your views sue, you've seen enough   
   >mayhew autographs (so have i, but like i said, i'm trying to avoid the   
   >"it doesn't look like mine" argument.)..   
   >   
   >have a look at the link. it's also from stricklers...   
   >   
   >http://pages.stricklersports.com/8987/PictPage/3923240213.html   
   >   
   >mike   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)