From: dahoov2@cox.net   
      
   This is true; I've never seen that happen...   
      
   But not sticking up for them; what I saw was bad and I cannot back   
   down.  And for a person who doesn't know them that well in one post,   
   they sure posted a lot "all of a sudden" and is sticking up for them   
   an awful lot too.  But I don't need to get into arguments with them.   
   I just need to stick to what I know and advise people accordingly.   
   Words on here slamming people just don't seem to accomplish much.   
   With that said there may be 200 people on here, but it's my guess 75%   
   of them don't care (lurk for addresses or info) or aren't even active   
   anymore.  Only about 10 people actively seem to contribute to this   
   group and so after a post or two, you are preaching to the choir so to   
   speak.   
      
   On Thu, 8 May 2008 19:30:08 +1000, "Mr Black"   
    wrote:   
      
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >"barefoot"  wrote in message   
   >news:16f14123-4268-4309-9602-33ec3019c0a4@y22g2000prd.googlegroups.com...   
   >> love how i tell "sharon" how trained my eye is, and "she" switches   
   >> subjects and tried to get on sue's good side...   
   >> "sharon" is a shill for strickler...a liar, cheat and thief.   
   >> m   
   >>   
   >   
   >I don't know strickler, so i wont call him what you have. but i do agree,   
   >imho "sharon" is a shill / sock account for either Lon himself, his wife, or   
   >an employee of his company.   
   >Im still waiting for an actual legitimate explanation of how a post from a   
   >supposed collector called "sharon" was posted from stricklersports@aol.com   
   >under the user name of stricklercelebs....Im mean seriously people....what   
   >more proof do we need?   
   >   
   >MrB   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)