From: dahoov2@cox.net   
      
   On Fri, 9 May 2008 19:48:43 +1000, "Mr Black"   
    wrote:   
      
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >"northfield"  wrote in message   
   >news:2eb152a4-1fbd-4eb6-9cf0-b200601b69a8@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...   
   >On May 8, 10:30?pm, Sue H  wrote:   
   >> If he was 32, 1976 would be his date not 1972. ?If born in 1972, he'd   
   >> be 36 or so. ?Give or take depending on the month.   
   >>   
   >> I think you did the math wrong.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> >hi barefoot...you state you 32 yo...so 09/14/1972 not your birthdate?   
   >> >you can post examples from websites all day but it still are images   
   >> >with no provenance. ?I looked at some of the examples you post...a   
   >> >forensic trained graphology expert can look at flow and style   
   >> >variation and tell there is high probablity that strickler items are   
   >> >authentic. I have been trained by Curt Baggett and can see the   
   >> >similarities. Forensic document experts must undergo two years full   
   >> >time training under a mentor. There are many people who pass   
   >> >themselves off as legitimate experts but are really not properly   
   >> >trained. many items especially photos are checks for fingerprint   
   >> >identification as well. ?that's why I don't take seriously those   
   >> >people who have no formal training - that included authentication   
   >> >companies. ?it's all a scam and most autograph dealers who make   
   >> >accusation about other dealers will rant and rant like yourself, but   
   >> >the proof is total subjective. Sharon- Hide quoted text -   
   >>   
   >> - Show quoted text -   
   >   
   >>>>hi sue - then his birth certificate and those people I mentioned are   
   >wrong. Sharon   
   >   
   >So "sharon"....why would a random collector know so much about barefoot   
   >??????   
   >   
   I am not sure the point of this.  All I pointed out was your post said   
   he was born in 1972 and he admitted to it and that mean he was 32.  I   
   pointed out the math was wrong (especially if you are stating you have   
   a birth certificate... but I can't believe that; that's hard to obtain   
   unless you have access to county records).   I could care less if he   
   lies about his age.  My birthday is this week and I've had a block on   
   my age since I turned 40.  I can't remember how old I am and when my   
   hubby asked me this week (my birtdhay is in a few days) how old I was   
   and I said who knows.  He said well figure it out you know when you   
   were born.  Sure I know the year, but I am trying to block that out   
   too. ...   If you ask me how old I am I'll admit to being 40 plus and   
   that's it.  If you asked me when I turned 40 what age I was, I'd tell   
   you 39 and that was like that for two years or so.  I used to laugh   
   about peoeple who did that (what's the point) but some people I   
   realize have a mortality smack at some point.  With some it's older   
   ... but me, it hit me hard.   
      
   Barefoot we know a lot about.  We already know he's an older than   
   average college student who's been going to college half his life....   
   and we know he probably does reside and visit between Arizona and   
   California (he's been really consistent on that).  We know his   
   personality, his writing style, the people he cohorts with and even   
   that he really has lived at home forever.... you either like or don't   
   like him.  We've all made our assment of him (and most have of me as   
   well or others on here).  It is what it is and I don't see a biggie on   
   it.  At 32 or 36 or even 40, his personality is still the same.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)