Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.collecting.autographs    |    Autograph collecting, auctioning etc    |    2,438 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 898 of 2,438    |
|    Sue H to All    |
|    Re: UACC/PSADNA    |
|    20 May 08 08:32:14    |
      From: dahoov2@cox.net              I must've missed something... someone posted something about you guys?       I think a decade ago is long enough for Ebay to let whatever happened       go. That wasn't THAT huge of an infraction (though you probably       should have thunk kids surf... but today? They see more surfing for       Paris Hilton sex tapes or playing video games like Grand Theft Auto).       By the way, I saw one nude photo on Ebay just the other day not on the       mature section so obviously their software is not that great. I never       understood where the line is drawn on nudity either. Why is it       someone can paint a nude and it's ok (even if realism) but it's not       for a tasteful photo? Now I can see some are HUGE boobs or something       in very provocative poses can be said to solicit sex and made to       titillate, but where's the line?              Anyway, your problem is no biggie so why even defend it. Ignore the       trolls.              On Tue, 20 May 2008 01:57:48 -0400, "AutographPros.com"        |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca