Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-xp    |    Actually wasn't too bad for a M$-OS    |    17,273 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,973 of 17,273    |
|    Unsteadyken to All    |
|    Re: Roadmap for PDF reader in Microsoft     |
|    17 Jun 20 21:48:36    |
      XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.windows7.general, microsoft.p       blic.windowsxp.general       From: unsteadyken@gmail.com              In article <170620200843019116%nospam@nospam.invalid>,              nospam says...              > nope. when viewed in the browser, the copy is in the browser cache,              Of course it is , and that is the local copy I was referring to.       I thought even the most argumentative fuckwit would understand that.              > which then is flushed when you close the window or shortly thereafter.              Only if the browser has been set to do that.                     > there's a *lot* less clutter and simplicity when a pdf is viewed       > directly in the browser, particularly if it's not worth keeping, as is       > usually the case.              Bollocks, my experience says otherwise. And since you have no idea how       pdfs are displayed on my 2 screen setup and have no idea which pdfs I       download then you appear to be arguing for the sake of it.              Do take a hike old chap, you are rather tiresome.              --       Ken              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca