Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-xp    |    Actually wasn't too bad for a M$-OS    |    17,273 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,166 of 17,273    |
|    Mayayana to All    |
|    Re: Why does my firewall want want to Al    |
|    13 May 21 09:37:19    |
      From: mayayana@invalid.nospam              | > It shouldn't. I've never allowed it and I'm not sure what       | > it may try to go out for.       |       | It's very likely that the one which initiate the network request, would be       a       | Shell Extension. Even more so if it's a third party one, which has its own       | built in auto-update feature.       |               Yes. That's what Explorer Bars, Drop Handlers, etc are.       They run in the Explorer process. So I would expect to see       Explorer trying to go online if a shell extension were making the       attempt. Though I've never checked that.        I thought I remembered Explorer trying to go out on my       system, in the past, but a check of my firewall settings shows       no setting for Explorer either way, indicating it's never attempted.              | > But Explorer is closely tied to IE, so it gets complicated.       |       | Not really. Explorer (i.e. explorer.exe) does not use any MSIE's embedded       | web browser component. Only third party shell extensions would do that.               There's no longer a browser window in folder windows, but       that's only one aspect. They're still deeply tied in XP. And as       you said, 3rd-party extensions change the picture.               I wrote my own Explorer Bar for folder windows and found that       it wasn't possible to not include IE. I just had to code it to       ignore IE. That is, the way it works is that your extension       gets notified of both IE and Explorer events. IE is also still       tied, nominally, into ShellFolderView. The browser window       is gone but the object model remains. And MS conflates IE       with networking functionality. So it's Explorer, but programmatically       it's often both. The naming is also confusing. I didn't want       to assume the OP knows the difference between iexplore       and explorer.               So can Explorer decide to go online of itself? I don't know       of a case where that would happen, but I wouldn't rule it out.       Personally I wouldn't allow either Explorer or IE to go online.       I love the power of IE and I love the Active Desktop tie-in,       but that rendered IE unsafe for online use.               There used to be debates about this in the VB group. People       were using functions like URLDownloadToFile and believed that       was not IE. But cookies will get saved in the Cookies folder!       Then people claimed those are "Windows" cookies, not IE       cookies. So even programmers didn't get the tie-in.               Until they finally came out with winhttp I was using straight       winsock to download files, in order to keep IE/Windows out       of it.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca