Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-xp    |    Actually wasn't too bad for a M$-OS    |    17,273 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,216 of 17,273    |
|    Ken Blake to Michael Trew    |
|    Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 1    |
|    19 Jun 21 09:24:10    |
      XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.comp.os.windows-8, alt.windows7.general       XPost: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general       From: ken@invalidemail.com              On 6/19/2021 9:20 AM, Michael Trew wrote:       > On 6/19/2021 10:54 AM, Mark Lloyd wrote:       >> On 6/18/21 3:24 PM, Michael Trew wrote:       >>       >> [snip]       >>       >>> ME should have never existed... could have easily waited for XP. ME       >>> was rushed out when consumers were confused by the release of Windows       >>> 2000 -- home users were buying it thinking it was the next home       >>> release. I've tried to install and run ME in the past... same hardware       >>> as 98 SE, yet I've never experienced so many BSOD's before. Yuck.       >>       >> I god a lot of those BSODs with ME. Just like 98. 2000 avoided mst of them.       >>       >       > I did as well, but ME still seemed glitchier, like a lot of thought       > didn't go into the OS in whole. The kind of put makeup on 98 SE.                     You're saying what many other people said, but it wasn't my experience.       I had no problems with Me.                     --       Ken              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca