Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-xp    |    Actually wasn't too bad for a M$-OS    |    17,273 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,217 of 17,273    |
|    Rene Lamontagne to Ken Blake    |
|    Re: [ Preview ] { Unofficial } Windows 1    |
|    19 Jun 21 12:29:01    |
      XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.comp.os.windows-8, alt.windows7.general       XPost: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general       From: rlamont@shaw.ca              On 2021-06-19 11:24 a.m., Ken Blake wrote:       > On 6/19/2021 9:20 AM, Michael Trew wrote:       >> On 6/19/2021 10:54 AM, Mark Lloyd wrote:       >>> On 6/18/21 3:24 PM, Michael Trew wrote:       >>>       >>> [snip]       >>>       >>>> ME should have never existed... could have easily waited for XP. ME       >>>> was rushed out when consumers were confused by the release of Windows       >>>> 2000 -- home users were buying it thinking it was the next home       >>>> release. I've tried to install and run ME in the past... same hardware       >>>> as 98 SE, yet I've never experienced so many BSOD's before. Yuck.       >>>       >>> I god a lot of those BSODs with ME. Just like 98. 2000 avoided mst of       >>> them.       >>>       >>       >> I did as well, but ME still seemed glitchier, like a lot of thought       >> didn't go into the OS in whole. The kind of put makeup on 98 SE.       >       >       > You're saying what many other people said, but it wasn't my experience.       > I had no problems with Me.       >       >              Yeah, I had no problems with ME, always wondered what the hell everyone       was bellyacking about, Only ever had 1 or 2 blue screens throughout its       life. :-)              Rene              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca