Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-xp    |    Actually wasn't too bad for a M$-OS    |    17,273 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,579 of 17,273    |
|    R.Wieser to All    |
|    Re: whats a good standard-to-SSL tunnel     |
|    22 May 23 08:48:30    |
      From: address@is.invalid              VanguardLH,              Update.              >> my googeling returned some info that seems to indicate that, for smtp,       >> port 587 is the one which does it the old way (using starttls etc.),       >> while port 465 just (presumably) expects a standard "port 110"       >> connection, just wrapped in an SSL layer.              I've taken a simple standard-to-SSL tunnel program, and it works as I       expected. SMTP over SSL port 465 is just port 25 wrapped in SSL. In the       same way POP3 over SSL port 995 is just port 110 wrapped in SSL.              Regards,       Rudy Wieser              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca