Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-xp    |    Actually wasn't too bad for a M$-OS    |    17,273 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,742 of 17,273    |
|    R.Wieser to All    |
|    Re: How can I get my hardware manager ba    |
|    02 Feb 24 09:29:03    |
      From: address@is.invalid              Marcus,              >>Carson,       >>       > Del              ???              >>I can imagine that, as Windows (as far back as XP) has got a "time       >>freeze" method build-in - to make copying of a HD possible while the       >>os is running on, and modifying it.       >>       >       > That is called making a backup.              Not quite.              Try to make copy all files from a drive which is activily in use and all you       will get is something which /looks/ right*, but will effectivily be       garbage - as some files will be changed after others have already been       backed up. IOW, the files will be out of sync with each other.              * ignoring the problems you will run into because of not being allowed to       copy files which are in use by other processes.              No, the "time freeze" (or "shadow copy" as its officially called) is       /preceeding/ the copying process, to make it *possible* to make a usefull       backup of an HD thats currently in use.              The trick would be to, on shutdown, instead of releasing the time-frozen       branch of files, release the other branch (the modified by the still running       OS files).              Full disclosure (of sorts): I'm a hobby programmer. :-)              Regards,       Rudy Wieser              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca