XPost: alt.windows7.general   
   From: address@is.invalid   
      
   Vanguard,   
      
   >> I did not ask you if you *now* can come up with something, I asked   
   >> you where you did *before* chewing me out over it.   
   >>   
   >> ... or did you hope I would not notice what you did ? :-)   
   >   
   > See Message-ID  where I mentioned   
   > filespec and /p arguments, and only those.  I said that 3 days ago.   
   > That was my first response.   
      
   Ah yes, I see it, at the bottom of a post starting with pedantry (I didn't   
   think you liked that) and other information unrelated to my question.  Quite   
   likely why I didn't finish reading it all of it.   
      
   But yes, its there.  My apologies for not noticing it.   
      
   See, thats how easy it can be to acknowledge a mistake.   
      
   >> And by the way, I seem to have found information where you can,   
   >> from the commandline, select a different printer.   
   >   
   > Yep, mentioned the /p arg back in my first response, too.   
      
   Alas, there you go again, reading what you want to read, not whats actually   
   posted.   
      
   You don't agree ?  Thats simple, show me where you mentioned /selecting a   
   different printer from wordpads commandline/.   
      
   >>> You're going to leave Wordpad windows open indefinitely until   
   >>> sometime later when you shutdown Windows?   
   >>   
   >>: -) You're fishing for reasons to why you can claim I'm wrong, and   
   >>: than retroactivily put that onto the current case, aren't you ?   
   >   
   > And you divert via lambaste by not saying why you need to keep Wordpad   
   > open between separate runs on your program.   
      
   Ah yes, first conjuring up a situation outof thin air, and than when I make   
   rather clear that I'm not going to humour you in that, you change your tune   
   and try to make it sound as if you said/ment something quite different.   
      
   As for /why/ I do it ?  Thats as little your concern as the program I   
   generate the document with was to J. P. .  And yes, you're /still/ fishing   
   for something you can complain about.   
      
   >>> Specifying the PID is one way.  Specifying the image name is another,   
   >>> but takes out all processes with the same image name.   
   >>   
   >> I suggest you do that again yourself, and now /actually read/ what it   
   >> says.   
   >>   
   >> Hint : the "/FI" argument.   
   >   
   > Which can also specify image name or PID.   
      
   :-) Ah yes, trying to divert attention away from you having made a mistake.   
      
   Golly, you do not like pedantry when I do it, but you have no problem doing   
   it yourself (in your first reply, way before I did).  And just here you make   
   it clear you do not like it when (you think) I try to divert attention, but   
   here you are, doing it yourself !   
      
   There is a word for people like you.  Hypocrite.   
      
   > Have you yet disclosed just how you are running taskkill?   
   > With which args?   
      
   Why would I need to do disclose that ?  Its part of the work/around *I*   
   brewed - before even posting the problem here I might say.  You have zero   
   right to any of it.   
      
   > Your "program" remains a mystery,   
      
   Good. That way you could not be sidetracked by it either.   
      
   > And you're still hiding.  Instead of answering on how you use   
   > taskkill, you obfuscate again.   
      
   Lol.   
      
   Pray tell, what would, or even /could/ I be hiding in that regard ?   
      
   Regards,   
   Rudy Wieser   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)