XPost: alt.windows7.general   
   From: address@is.invalid   
      
   Frank,   
      
   >  If you think Newyana2 needs to "back up" his "unsolvable puzzles"   
   > statement, you may want to enroll in Logic 101.   
      
   :-) I did not expect him to prove it.  I'm not /that/ daft.   
      
   But I think I may expect him to be able to explain /why/ he thinks its   
   unsolvable.  Otherwise his classification isn't worth the ink its written   
   with.   
      
   And pardon me, I've more than once encountered people who use similar claims   
   just because they either could not grasp the problem, or didn't actually   
   want to try to solve it.  You know, Its too *hard*.   
      
   >  I've noted you tend to emit this logical fallacy when you get   
   > too worked up (which is a quite common occurence). There's a   
   > lesson in there.   
      
   I disagree.  See above.   
      
   But, if you can quote something specific we could always discuss it.  For   
   some odd reason I've got very little problem with being proven wrong.   
      
   Regards,   
   Rudy Wieser   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)