Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-xp    |    Actually wasn't too bad for a M$-OS    |    17,273 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,861 of 17,273    |
|    R.Wieser to All    |
|    Re: piping / redirecting into a vbs scri    |
|    26 Apr 24 12:05:06    |
      XPost: alt.windows7.general       From: address@is.invalid              Frank,              >> >> > My guess was/is that the 'command interpreter' (Rudy doesn't say       >> >> > how he invokes his commands)       >> >>       >> >> I didn't ?       >> >>       >> >> [quote first post]       >> >> I tried to redirect some commandline output into a vbscript       >> >> [/quote]       >> >>       >> >> Besides that, the "echo hello | ..." and "... < data.txt" should have       >> >> been dead give-aways.       >> >       >> > As you didn't specifically say you invoked from cmd.exe, I said       >> > 'command interpreter', i.e. the general term. That's all.       >>       >> (I quoted everything. Otherwise you will just complain I snipped       >> important       >> stuff)       >>       >> Really ?       >>       >> You said : "Rudy doesn't say how he invokes his commands".       >>       >> And I responded with quoting from my first post. So yes, I did say it.       >> There was nothing to guess at.       >       > Sigh!       >       > Not that, despite your aggressive, confrontational, insulting       > communication style, you still deserve a response, but saying       > "commandline" is not unambiguous.              So, now you changing your tune frm "he didn't say" to "he didn't specify the       exact one he used" ? Great going kid. Really, great going.              A bit obvious though.              But, if you think its ambiguous you can /ofcourse/ tell us *how* its       ambiguous - and follow that up with how its relevant.              Although I'm sure you can come up with the former, you will be hard-pressed       with the latter - in regard to the current subject ofcourse. Take a wild       guess how I know that.              > That why I said what I said. Like I said "... That's all.". Time to       > get over it.              "get over" that you claim untrue stuff about what I said ? While you even       refuse to acknowledge that you made a mistake there ? Yeah, I think that       would make your life a bit/lot easier, wouldn't it ?              I suggest you "get over" the idea that you can make mistakes and than "make       them go away" by simply ignoring them when they are pointed out to you. It       doesn't work that way.              You wanted to talk about "insulting" ? Than don't try to demand that I       ignore your mistakes toward me - while you still try to pick upon the ones       you think I made.              Regards, and "thank you"       Rudy Wieser              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca