XPost: alt.windows7.general   
   From: address@is.invalid   
      
   Frank,   
      
   >  I only called you on the logical fallacy of your demand to Newyana2   
   > to "back up" his "unsolvable puzzles" statement.   
      
   And I called bullshit on that "logical fallacy" of yours - and explained   
   why.  I have not seen you respond to that.  Another example of your "if I   
   ignore it hard enough it never happened" methodology.   
      
   >  All other responses were triggered by *your* responses to my responses   
   > to *others* (VanguardLH and John).   
      
   Ah yes, when you specifically talk about me than any response of mine is   
   *ofcourse* on my head, and /not at all/ provoked by you.   
      
   Examples of you talking about me :   
      
   [quote]   
   My guess was/is that the 'command interpreter' (Rudy doesn't say   
   how he invokes his commands)   
   [/quote]   
      
   [quote]   
   Rudy's problem is that he can't imagine that someone interprets his   
   posts in any other way than he does. If there's another interpretation,   
   it's the other guy's fault and things go downhill from there.   
   [/quote]   
      
   [quote]   
   Nope, he 'discovered' no such thing. He specified the .vbs extension   
   *and* he added wscript.exe to interpret the .vbs file.   
   [/quote]   
      
   The below one was actualy directed at me, even though I wasn't talking at   
   you.  IOW, *you* butted into my talking to /someone else/.   Yes indeed,   
   exactly that which you now try to accuse me of.  Hypocricy much ?   
      
   [quote]   
   If you think Newyana2 needs to "back up" his "unsolvable puzzles"   
   statement, you may want to enroll in Logic 101.   
   [/quote]   
      
   > As implied by my 'Disclaimer:', I never addressed the problem you   
   > described in your OP.   
      
   True, you didn't addres the problem I presented.  Noone here did.  But you   
   talked about everything I had posted about it.  As prrof see above.   
      
   > (So any complaints on that are misplaced.)   
      
   Did I make any ?  Can you quote one ?   No, I didn't think so.   
      
   And do yourself a favour : before you quote one do check if the complaint   
   was about you.  So, no "people that post work-arounds when I explicitily   
   said not to want them" quoting.   
      
   >  (Also) Enroll in Usenet 101 and Reading for Comprehension 101.   
      
   As you have not posted any reasoning and/or underbuilding for those   
   suggestions I'm going to efectivily ignore them as the hot air they are.   
      
   But hey, if you want to be respectfully adresed than you only have to be   
   respectfull yourself.  And that includes responding when some asks you to   
   clarify yourself.  And ofcourse acknowledge and fix mistakes you make.   
      
   If you cannot get yourself to do that than you should not complain about the   
   inevitable result.  Thats also "usenet 101"   
      
   > "Goodbye Rudy."   
      
   :-) "Imitation is the Sincerest Form of Flattery"   
      
   But yes, I think its a good idea, seeing how you refuse to respond to quoted   
   and underbuild "are you sure about that ?" posts of mine.   
      
   Goodbye frank.   
      
   Regards,   
   Rudy Wieser   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)