XPost: alt.comp.lang.vbscript, alt.windows7.general   
   From: toylet.toylet@gmail.com   
      
   On 8/11/2025 4:07 pm, R.Wieser wrote:   
   >   
   > I'm not at all sure about the first, as the "next" pointer (for the   
   > iteration) doesn't need to be replaced (assuming that its retrieved and   
   > stored somewhere as part of advancing to the current item).   
   >   
   > The problem with a "for i=0 to dict.count-1" loop is that it both will skip   
   > the item after the one thats being removed, and it will not adjust the "upto   
   > here" part of the for loop to the new size of the array.   
      
   You can always create a small program with a simpler oDict to find out.   
   Anyway, glad you solved the problem.   
      
   --   
      @~@   Simplicity is Beauty! Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch!   
     / v \  May the Force and farces be with you! Live long and prosper!!   
   /( _ )\ https://sites.google.com/site/changmw/   
      ^ ^   https://github.com/changmw/changmw   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)