home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.comp.os.windows-xp      Actually wasn't too bad for a M$-OS      17,273 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 17,140 of 17,273   
   R.Wieser to All   
   Re: Worldmap mercator projection - Latit   
   21 Jan 26 20:01:17   
   
   XPost: alt.windows7.general, alt.comp.os.windows-10   
   From: address@is.invalid   
      
   Paul,   
      
   >  ln(2.097283) = 0.740643   # Via the ln() button on my calculator   
      
   And that 0.740643 points to somewhere between the northpole and canada on an   
   ice plate.  Where I'm quite sure Washington DC isn't located.   
      
   Which was why I started to doubt that "ln()" equals "log()".  But if not,   
   what is it ?   
      
   > The plot origin must not be where we think it is.   
      
   Well, thats easy to check : Just calculate the result for a Latitude of Zero   
   degrees.  It should point at the equator.   
      
   > Notice how in a lot of these mathematics discussions, nobody labels a damn   
   > thing.   
      
   Just mathematics ?    A couple of weeks ago I tried to find example code for   
   OpenSLL.  I could find some, but with zero indication which version of the   
   DLL it was for - and it matters a *lot*.  It frustrates me to no end.   
      
   >> 0.117959 is *way* to low   
   >   
   > But it is 0.5 minus that number, so 0.382 .   
      
   In my previous message I mentioned that I multiply the result by half the   
   height of the map, and subtract it from the equator (again, half the height   
   of the map).  That is the same, right ?   
      
   Actually, it isn't.  :-)   
      
   Now you have shown that the log() in the formule you presented is exactly   
   that (and not a elog() (natural log?) ) I had some solid ground from which I   
   could look further.   
      
   The whole problem is that your formule multiplies by the full height of the   
   map, and my "simplified" one multiplied by *half* the maps height (and than   
   subtracts from the equator).   
      
   When I multiplied my result by two the result was the same as what came   
   outof your formule.   
      
   Thank you for that. :-)   
      
   mea culpa : after noticing that my implementation of the formule didn't work   
   I *should* have first tried to implement it as provided. :-|   
      
      
   Than only one thing remains : Any idea why the first formule doesn't give   
   the expected result ?   
      
   Regards,   
   Rudy Wieser   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca