Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-xp    |    Actually wasn't too bad for a M$-OS    |    17,273 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,241 of 17,273    |
|    J. P. Gilliver to Paul    |
|    Re: why graphical screenshot? from a com    |
|    17 Feb 26 21:11:38    |
      XPost: alt.windows7.general, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.msdos.batch.nt       From: G6JPG@255soft.uk              On 2026/2/17 10:43:40, Paul wrote:       > On Tue, 2/17/2026 5:01 AM, R.Wieser wrote:       >> Mr. Man-wai Chang,       >>       >>> But that's a different newsgroup. Not a good idea in terms of discussion.       >>       >> And uploading a file to another, completely unrelated server is better ? :-p              On the whole, yes; it doesn't put any load on newsservers.       >>       >> But yes, people would need to be aware that responding to the post with the       >> attachment would do little good. Just like an uploader would need to be       >> aware that file servers have their own rules and hurdles (cough, javascript,       >> cough) for anyone wanting to take a peek at their upload.              Yes, they're a pain (and see below re one of them and the UK) - though       understandable, they have to be funded somehow! [For something like a       screenshot, I tend to just stick it in a temp directory on my website,       but obviously that's only an option for those who have a website.]       >>       >>> You also need a way to tell others to go that newsgroup to see the image       >>> by what, message-id? :)       >>       >> Thats the same problem as with those image/file servers.       >>       >> I could imagine prefixing the name of image with the subject of the thread       >> its referred from. Perhaps with the posters name appended. Or even just       >> the posters name.       >>       >> Regards,       >> Rudy Wieser       >       > The M-ID would work, but only for M-ID enabled News Clients.              Exactly.              > Betterbird or Thunderbird, may be about to gain this function.              Interesting; I didn't know that.       >       > Storage in "de.alt.dateien.misc" would only be as deep       > as the retention on the server, so that could scroll off.              On the whole, the requirement for a screenshot isn't long, though. (And       what is the retention on the image/file sharing sites?)              >       > Posting a URL to an image-server item isn't difficult, but       > you have to use a browser suited to the job. Some of the image-servers       > expect to be running their Javascript on the web page, and the       > web page may remain blank if the Javascript does not run.              I've noticed some posters (including you) include a hint to how to       minimise the worst effects.       >       > And in the UK, at least one of the image-servers is blocked.              Indeed; when UK introduced responsibility legislation, that site just       decided to block UK, rather than - presumably - employ people to vet all       uploads; seems a reasonable action to me.              >       > Paul              John              --       J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf              I'd rather trust the guys in the lab coats who aren't demanding that I       get up early on Sundays to apologize for being human. -- Captain       Splendid (quoted by "The Real Bev" in mozilla.general, 2014-11-16)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca