Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-10    |    Steaming pile of horseshit Windows 10    |    197,590 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 195,595 of 197,590    |
|    Daniel70 to J. P. Gilliver    |
|    Re: Windows 10 end of life is pushing us    |
|    18 Nov 25 22:32:06    |
      XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy       From: daniel47@nomail.afraid.org              On 18/11/2025 12:57 am, J. P. Gilliver wrote:       > On 2025/11/17 12:44:21, Daniel70 wrote:       >> On 15/11/2025 10:29 am, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       >>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2025 23:17:19 +0000, David B. wrote:       >>>       >>>> Can you explain WHY there is a need for different lasers?       >>>       >>> The DVD pits are too small and too close together to be made out with the       >>> CD laser.       >       > Yes, but the CD pits are obviously _not_ too small to be made out with       > the DVD laser, so _that_ still doesn't explain the need for two. It       > _may_ be something to do with refraction.>>       >>> Similarly, Blu-Ray (and its late competitor HD-DVD) required moving to a       >>> blue laser (hence the name) to read its even finer pits.       >>>       >> I can recall seeing DVD's that had 9.4GB capacity.       >>       >> I was told that, somehow, they had two Data levels, rather than using       >> 'half size' bits all on the one level.       >>       >> How did these High Density Disks work .... and how could a normal DVD       >> Player read them??       > Two ways: one way, which I think was hardly ever used, was to use both       > sides, just like an audio record - basically two back-to-back. I think       > two reasons against: 1. you can't have a label (or, it has to be       > restricted to just the very centre); 2. the user has to turn it over (or       > you have to make a player with two readers, which is more expensive and       > makes it - the player - thicker).              So like 'they' did with 5.25 inch Floppies, 3.5 inch Floppies, CDs and,       I think, DVDs.              > The main way was/is "dual layer",       > where there are two layers of data: the innermost one is read _through_       > the outermost, which is thus out-of-focus. For commercial movies, the       > changeover point is obviously chosen to be a point in the movie where       > it's faded to black, or similar; one "half" (they don't have to be       > equal) plays as normal from the middle outwards, but to minimise the       > changeover time, the second half is played from the outside in, like an       > LP/single.       >       O.K., thanks to you and Paul.       --       Daniel70              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca