Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-10    |    Steaming pile of horseshit Windows 10    |    197,590 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 195,701 of 197,590    |
|    Brock McNuggets to All    |
|    Re: Windows 10 end of life is pushing us    |
|    20 Nov 25 20:44:31    |
      XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy       From: brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com              On Nov 20, 2025 at 1:15:34 PM MST, "Lawrence D´Oliveiro" wrote       <10fnst6$36q3t$1@dont-email.me>:              > On 20 Nov 2025 15:26:00 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:       >       >> WSL1 made sense for Windows because Windows had no real POSIX layer       >> to protect, so Microsoft could bolt on a syscall-translation shim       >> without breaking anything.       >       > That’s a pretty lame description, let’s face it.              Go on.              >       >> macOS is in a different situation. Its BSD/Mach stack and POSIX APIs       >> are used all over the system. Trying to bolt Linux syscalls and       >> semantics onto that -- with Linux's interface differences, device       >> models, virtual file system, event notification system, namespaces,       >> and so on -- isn't a "minor difference," and it would risk breaking       >> actual macOS software.       >       > No it wouldn’t. Think of how BSDs are able to offer Linux       > compatibility; macOS is supposedly derived from BSD, isn’t it? So why       > can’t it do the same?               Trying to bolt Linux syscalls and semantics onto that -- with        Linux's interface differences, device models, virtual file        system, event notification system, namespaces, and so on --        isn't a "minor difference," and it would risk breaking        actual macOS software.              Remember, while macOS is absolutely tied to BSD, it is not BSD.              >> And yes, Apple (and MS) pulling in open source pieces to do that is       >> completely normal.       >       > The market leader doesn’t need to pay attention to compatibility with       > also-ran competitors: it does the leading, they do the following, not       > the other way round.              Not sure you understand what open source is. Both Apple and MS use a lot of it       and that is fine. There are no limits to them using it, and the fact they do       is a good thing for the open source world.              > The fact that both Microsoft and Apple feel the need to pay a great       > deal of attention to Linux compatibility shows that they are no longer       > the market leaders; they are now having to follow where Linux is       > leading.              What makes you think this?              --       It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with       you.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca