home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.comp.os.windows-10      Steaming pile of horseshit Windows 10      197,590 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 196,117 of 197,590   
   Paul to Physics Perspective   
   Re: Why It's "IMPOSSIBLE" Humans Landed    
   10 Dec 25 00:57:58   
   
   [continued from previous message]   
      
   people want to go to planets. We're evolved for planetary life. We want ground   
   beneath our feet, a horizon, a sky, even if it's a Martian sky. So, I think   
   we'll pursue both space stations and planetary colonies. Different approaches   
   to the same goal, expanding human civilization beyond Earth. Now, let me talk   
   about timelines.   
      
    01:13:56   
    When will we actually go to Mars? NASA says the   
   2030s. Maybe if the funding holds, if the technology works, if the political   
   will persists, SpaceX is more ambitious. Elon Musk talks about the 2020s,   
   building a city on Mars, sending hundreds of people. But that seems optimistic,   
   wildly optimistic. My guess, first humans on Mars in the 2032s, a small crew,   
   a short stay, a flags and footprints mission like Apollo, and then decades   
   more before we establish a permanent presence. It's going to be   
      
    01:14:39   
   slow, much slower than people hope because Mars is really hard and because   
   we don't have the same urgency we had with the moon race. Unless something   
   changes, unless China or another country makes it a national priority, unless   
   there's a new space race, then things could accelerate. Competition drives   
   progress. That's what got us to the moon. Kennedy framed it as a race against   
   the Soviets. And that motivated the spending, the effort, the focus. Maybe we   
   need that again. a new competitor, a new challenge, something   
      
    01:15:18   
    to   
   drive us forward. Now, let me talk about something philosophical. The meaning   
   of space exploration. Why does it matter? Why should we care? Some people   
   say we shouldn't. They say we should fix problems on Earth first. Poverty,   
   disease, climate change. Spend money on those, not on space. And I understand   
   that argument. I really do. There are serious problems on Earth that need   
   attention. But here's the thing. Space exploration doesn't take away from   
   solving Earth's problems. The entire   
      
    01:15:53   
    global space industry is   
   about $400 billion per year. That sounds like a lot, but it's less than   
   half a percent of global GDP. It's a tiny fraction of what we spend on   
   everything else. And space technology helps solve Earth problems. Weather   
   satellites help predict storms and save lives. GPS enables navigation and   
   commerce. Earth observation satellites monitor climate change, deforestation,   
   ocean health. Communication satellites connect remote areas. The technology   
   we develop for space, solar panels, water   
      
    01:16:29   
    purification, medical   
   devices finds applications on Earth. Space exploration drives innovation that   
   benefits everyone. But more than that, space exploration is about hope. It's   
   about believing in the future. It's about dreaming big. It's about showing what   
   humans can accomplish when we work together toward a common goal. The Apollo   
   program inspired an entire generation. Kids who watched the moon landings   
   became scientists, engineers, entrepreneurs. They created the technologies   
   we use today. Computers,   
      
    01:17:09   
    the internet, smartphones, all of it   
   traces back in part to the inspiration and innovation of the space age. So   
   space exploration isn't a luxury. It's an investment in our future. It's how we   
   inspire the next generation to solve the challenges we face. Now, let me talk   
   about something that really excites me. The Cardartesev scale. I've mentioned   
   this before, but let me go deeper. This is a way of classifying civilizations   
   based on energy use. Type one is planetary. We control all the energy of   
      
      
    01:17:46   
    our planet. We can manipulate weather, prevent earthquakes,   
   harness geothermal energy, solar energy, everything. We're currently about   
   type0.7. We're getting there, but we're not there yet. Type two is stellar. We   
   can harness all the energy of our star. A Dyson sphere, a mega structure that   
   surrounds the sun and captures all its output. Sounds like science fiction,   
   but it's physically possible. Type three is galactic. We can harness the   
   energy of an entire galaxy. We're talking about a   
      
    01:18:23   
    civilization   
   that spans millions of star systems, that can manipulate black holes, that   
   operates on a cosmic scale. Now, where are we? We're type 0.7. We still get   
   most of our energy from fossil fuels, dead plants. That's primitive. That's   
   caveman stuff on a cosmic scale. But we're transitioning. Solar power,   
   wind power, nuclear power, clean energy. In a hundred years, maybe 200,   
   we'll hit type one. We'll be a planetary civilization. And then the next step   
   is type two. To reach that, we need to   
      
    01:18:59   
    expand into space. We   
   need to colonize other worlds. We need to build solar power satellites,   
   space habitats, maybe eventually a Dyson sphere that's thousands of years   
   away, maybe tens of thousands, but it's the direction we're headed if we   
   don't destroy ourselves first. And that's the key question. Will we make   
   it? Will we survive long enough to become a type one, type two, type three   
   civilization? Or will we destroy ourselves through war, environmental collapse,   
   or some other catastrophe? I'm   
      
    01:19:31   
    optimistic. I think we'll make   
   it, but it's not guaranteed. We have to work for it. We have to make the   
   right choices. And space exploration is part of that. It's how we ensure   
   long-term survival. is how we spread humanity across multiple worlds so   
   that no single disaster can wipe us out. Now, let me talk about something   
   personal. My own journey with physics in space. When I was 8 years old   
   and I saw that photo of Einstein's unfinished manuscript, I knew I wanted   
   to understand the universe. I   
      
    01:20:02   
    wanted to know how everything   
   works. And as I learned more, as I studied physics, I realized that space   
   is part of that. Understanding the universe means understanding not just the   
   laws of physics but also our place in the cosmos. The moon landings showed us   
   something profound. They showed us earth from space. That famous earthrise   
   photo from Apollo 8, the blue marble photo from Apollo 17. These images   
   changed how we see ourselves. We realize that Earth is small, fragile,   
   a tiny island of life in a vast hostile universe. And that   
      
    01:20:40   
   realization led to the environmental movement to the understanding that we   
   need to take care of our planet because it's the only one we have. But it   
   also showed us that we don't have to stay on this one planet forever. We   
   can reach other worlds. We can expand our horizons. We're not limited to   
   Earth. And that's a powerful idea. It means the future is open. It means we   
   have choices. It means humanity has a destiny beyond this one planet. Now,   
   let me address something important. The   
      
    01:21:10   
    conspiracy theories. Why   
   do people believe the moon landings were faked? Part of it is distrust of   
   government. People saw the government lie about Vietnam, Watergate, all   
   kinds of things. So, they think if they lied about that, maybe they lied   
   about the moon, too. Part of it is the seeming impossibility of it. As we've   
   discussed, the moon landings really were incredible, almost too incredible to   
   believe. So some people just can't accept that we actually did it. And part   
   of it is the desire to be part of a special group   
      
    01:21:43   
    that knows the   
   real truth. Conspiracy theories make people feel smart, like they figured out   
   something others haven't. But the evidence is overwhelming. We really went to   
   the moon. The physics works out. The engineering makes sense. The independent   
   verification confirms it. The physical evidence exists. Believing it was   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca