Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-10    |    Steaming pile of horseshit Windows 10    |    197,590 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 196,177 of 197,590    |
|    J. P. Gilliver to All    |
|    Re: Why It's "IMPOSSIBLE" Humans Landed     |
|    12 Dec 25 13:50:29    |
      XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11       From: G6JPG@255soft.uk              On 2025/12/11 17:4:19, v55 wrote:              [excellent text deleted]              > Kaku is correct that a manned moon shot *is* a hard problem, and an expensive       > endeavour, which is why it's only been a very small number of nations that       > have gotten *anything* on the moon (Russia, China, India, Japan, Luxembourg,       > UAE, Israel, EU), and even fewer that have accomplished a soft-landing (US,              1. I don't remember a Luxembourg space programme - certainly not getting       to the moon.       2. The EU is not (yet?) a nation, though the nations comprising it (plus       some others - I think UK still has involvement, both financial and       technical, though not part of the EU, in ESA) have created a fairly       successful association.              []       > So, while Professor Kaku has some understandable concerns about the extreme       > difficulties involved with doing a manned lunar landing...the baseline,       > fundamental question that Kaku *must* contend with, is that no nation, friend       > or foe, ever came forward to claim the lunar landing was faked. "But it was       > hard"...yes, but the Russians agreed it happened. "But the computers were       > slow!" ...yes, but the Austrailians agreed it happened. "But there was a lot       > of radiation!" ...yes, but the Japanese agreed it happened. The claim that it       > was faked must account for the tens of thousands of people who would all have       > to be lying to cover up America's secret, including America's enemies at the       > time.              Indeed. Though the film (Caprcorn One, I think it was called) was fun at       the time.              --        J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf               The impression is that the reporter doesn't really understand the       subject and he is mistaking the expert's slow methodical thought for a       politician's prevarication or a layman's ignorance.       - Liz Tuddenham in uk.media.radio.bbc-r4, 2022-3-6              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca