home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.comp.os.windows-10      Steaming pile of horseshit Windows 10      197,590 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 196,177 of 197,590   
   J. P. Gilliver to All   
   Re: Why It's "IMPOSSIBLE" Humans Landed    
   12 Dec 25 13:50:29   
   
   XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11   
   From: G6JPG@255soft.uk   
      
   On 2025/12/11 17:4:19, v55 wrote:   
      
   [excellent text deleted]   
      
   > Kaku is correct that a manned moon shot *is* a hard problem, and an expensive   
   > endeavour, which is why it's only been a very small number of nations that   
   > have gotten *anything* on the moon (Russia, China, India, Japan, Luxembourg,   
   > UAE, Israel, EU), and even fewer that have accomplished a soft-landing (US,   
      
   1. I don't remember a Luxembourg space programme - certainly not getting   
   to the moon.   
   2. The EU is not (yet?) a nation, though the nations comprising it (plus   
   some others - I think UK still has involvement, both financial and   
   technical, though not part of the EU, in ESA) have created a fairly   
   successful association.   
      
   []   
   > So, while Professor Kaku has some understandable concerns about the extreme   
   > difficulties involved with doing a manned lunar landing...the baseline,   
   > fundamental question that Kaku *must* contend with, is that no nation, friend   
   > or foe, ever came forward to claim the lunar landing was faked. "But it was   
   > hard"...yes, but the Russians agreed it happened. "But the computers were   
   > slow!" ...yes, but the Austrailians agreed it happened. "But there was a lot   
   > of radiation!" ...yes, but the Japanese agreed it happened. The claim that it   
   > was faked must account for the tens of thousands of people who would all have   
   > to be lying to cover up America's secret, including America's enemies at the   
   > time.   
      
   Indeed. Though the film (Caprcorn One, I think it was called) was fun at   
   the time.   
      
   --    
   J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf   
       
   The impression is that the reporter doesn't really understand the   
   subject and he is mistaking the expert's slow methodical thought for a   
   politician's prevarication or a layman's ignorance.   
   - Liz Tuddenham in uk.media.radio.bbc-r4, 2022-3-6   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca