Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-10    |    Steaming pile of horseshit Windows 10    |    197,590 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 196,255 of 197,590    |
|    R.Wieser to All    |
|    Re: Tutorial: Notepad++ shortcuts.xml ma    |
|    15 Dec 25 14:44:24    |
      XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows       From: address@is.invalid              Arlen,              >> Why is it always /us/ who have to provide you with the information /you/       >> want/need - nonwithstanding how easily its to google ?       >       > The whole point of providing open source code is so everyone improves it.              No. So that anyone *can* improve on it.              Its just you who thinks that and as such demands from us to do all the hard       work and fix your steaming shitpiles up into something that can be called       usefull, and than take all the credit for it.              Proof of that ? When was the last time you attributed a       change/fix/addition to someone ?              More proof ? You have yet to tell me hoe my suggested re-ordering of those       "the essential trio" macro-command works. It would have taken you what ?       All of 10 minutes ?              Heck, you even *complained* that I did not thank you for having having fixed       all the things I found.              The thing is, kid, *I should not have had to provide you with /any/ of it*.       As I said, I found that with a cursory inspection. You ? *You* should       have done a thorough inspection and found all of that (and likely more)       yourself.              Also, someone creating something open source normally takes much pride in       offering SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY WORKS AND IS DESCRIBED CORRECTLY. You       definitily don't. :-(((              To be honest, I do not even know which part of that macro is npp's and which       part is yours - if any part of it (besides the things to replace and what to       replace it with) is actually yours.              > It's fast. Effective. Simple. If anyone has a *better* solution, please       > let all of us know what that is.              You already have it. You just, as so often, refuse to (test and)       acknowledge it.              > Otherwise, this is the best (so far) that I can offer the team to use.       >       >        >        >        >        >               Thats funny, as I already gave you better - and you didn't even have to do       /anything/ for it.              But thats you to the dot. : You get information that your above guesses to       what those commands mean are incorrect, but you cannot get yourself to       accept it. Not when you publicly have to acknowledge that there are people       in this newsgroup who know more (even just about this) than you.              Tell me : why should an "1701 = end this search/replace block" need to have       an "lParam=1609" argument ? Why isn't "lparam" just Zero ? How many kinds       of "end this search/replace block" would npp need/have ? What *else* would       that 1701 command be doing when that "lparam" argument is given another       value ? And if it does something different, why did you give the 1701       command a single "this is what it does" explanation/description ?              You pride yourself on being logical. If you can't answer the above than       you should tone-down that pride. Not that you ever will ofcourse. :-)              Regards,       Rudy Wieser              P.s.       Its always remarkable how you, when you don't get your way, start to throw       accusations of wrongdoing around, but when asked to quote how/where that       that happened you always drop the matter like hot potato.              p.p.s.       You don't have to take my words as the truth. In fact, I always told my       pupils that they shouldn't. But I /did/ expect them to use the tools at       hand - first books, later the internet - to look stuff up and come to their       own conclusions Which, surprise, surprise, most always matched what I       told them (and when not we /both/ had a "learning moment").              As long as you can't even get yourself to do a bit of googeling to       verify/prove that your own claims are correct / the others (my) claims are       not you will forever stay willfully ignorant. That is what your ego is       doing to you. -|              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca