home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.comp.os.windows-10      Steaming pile of horseshit Windows 10      197,590 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 196,255 of 197,590   
   R.Wieser to All   
   Re: Tutorial: Notepad++ shortcuts.xml ma   
   15 Dec 25 14:44:24   
   
   XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows   
   From: address@is.invalid   
      
   Arlen,   
      
   >> Why is it always /us/ who have to provide you with the information /you/   
   >> want/need - nonwithstanding how easily its to google ?   
   >   
   > The whole point of providing open source code is so everyone improves it.   
      
   No.  So that anyone *can* improve on it.   
      
   Its just you who thinks that and as such demands from us to do all the hard   
   work and fix your steaming shitpiles up into something that can be called   
   usefull, and than take all the credit for it.   
      
   Proof of that ?   When was the last time you attributed a   
   change/fix/addition to someone ?   
      
   More proof ?  You have yet to tell me hoe my suggested re-ordering of those   
   "the essential trio" macro-command works.   It would have taken you what ?   
   All of 10 minutes ?   
      
   Heck, you even *complained* that I did not thank you for having having fixed   
   all the things I found.   
      
   The thing is, kid, *I should not have had to provide you with /any/ of it*.   
   As I said, I found that with a cursory inspection.   You ?  *You* should   
   have done a thorough inspection and found all of that (and likely more)   
   yourself.   
      
   Also, someone creating something open source normally takes much pride in   
   offering SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY WORKS AND IS DESCRIBED CORRECTLY.   You   
   definitily don't. :-(((   
      
   To be honest, I do not even know which part of that macro is npp's and which   
   part is yours - if any part of it (besides the things to replace and what to   
   replace it with) is actually yours.   
      
   > It's fast. Effective. Simple. If anyone has a *better* solution, please   
   > let all of us know what that is.   
      
   You already have it.  You just, as so often, refuse to (test and)   
   acknowledge it.   
      
   > Otherwise, this is the best (so far) that I can offer the team to use.   
   >   
   >    
   >    
   >    
   >    
   >    
      
   Thats funny, as I already gave you better - and you didn't even have to do   
   /anything/ for it.   
      
   But thats you to the dot. : You get information that your above guesses to   
   what those commands mean are incorrect, but you cannot get yourself to   
   accept it.  Not when you publicly have to acknowledge that there are people   
   in this newsgroup who know more (even just about this) than you.   
      
   Tell me : why should an "1701 = end this search/replace block" need to have   
   an "lParam=1609" argument ?   Why isn't "lparam" just Zero ? How many kinds   
   of "end this search/replace block" would npp need/have ?   What *else* would   
   that 1701 command be doing when that "lparam" argument is given another   
   value ?    And if it does something different, why did you give the 1701   
   command a single "this is what it does" explanation/description ?   
      
   You pride yourself on being logical.   If you can't answer the above than   
   you should tone-down that pride.  Not that you ever will ofcourse. :-)   
      
   Regards,   
   Rudy Wieser   
      
   P.s.   
   Its always remarkable how you, when you don't get your way, start to throw   
   accusations of wrongdoing around, but when asked to quote how/where that   
   that happened you always drop the matter like hot potato.   
      
   p.p.s.   
   You don't have to take my words as the truth.  In fact, I always told my   
   pupils that they shouldn't.  But I /did/ expect them to use the tools at   
   hand - first books, later the internet - to look stuff up and come to their   
   own conclusions    Which, surprise, surprise, most always matched what I   
   told them (and when not we /both/ had a "learning moment").   
      
   As long as you can't even get yourself to do a bit of googeling to   
   verify/prove that your own claims are correct / the others (my) claims are   
   not you will forever stay willfully ignorant.  That is what your ego is   
   doing to you. -|   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca