XPost: alt.windows7.general
From: V@nguard.LH
Schugo wrote:
> On 25.12.2025 03:33, VanguardLH wrote:
>> Schugo wrote:
>>
>>> On 24.12.2025 18:04, VanguardLH wrote:
>>>> "J. P. Gilliver" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> nslookup
>>>>> Server: UnKnown
>>>>> Address: 192.168.1.254
>>>>>
>>>>> Name: .plus.com
>>>>> Address:
>>>>
>>>> Are you using the DNS server at your ISP? Didn't you mention Plus is
>>>> shoving their customers over to Greenly (or something similarly named)?
>>>> Instead of defaulting to using your ISP's DNS server (assigned to you by
>>>> their DHCP server), configure the DNS servers for the IPv4 and IPv6
>>>> attributes on your network devices defined in the OS to use some other
>>>> DNS servers, like Cloudflare, Google, or other providers.
>>>
>>> -> completely useless!
>>>
>>> The websever that you connect can impossibly know how you resolved the
>>> IP address.
>>>
>>> ciao..
>>
>> You mentioned CGNAT at the ISP. Well, if you use DoH and VPN, they
>> don't know where you visit, so no inspection of your traffic to cause
>> delay, and the VPN exit node will not match that of the ISP's.
>
> It turned out that it's not using CGNAT (wrong information on a website)
>
> VPN maybe helps here, but the risk that you get even more blocks gets higher,
> because many websites hate VPNs and you may have even more "bad acting
> neighbours" in the same (shuffled) IP range.
>
> ciao..
Just like the map of Tor exit nodes, there are maps of VPN exit nodes.
If a site doesn't want Tor or VPN visitors, they can block them. I
don't remember the site, but I hit one a couple weeks ago that said I
couldn't visit them using a VPN. They knew I was exiting from a VPN.
It was to circumvent their geofencing, but they countered by not
allowing VPN visitors. They were determined to allow an audience from a
specific region. Well, their site, their rules, and a goodby to them.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
