XPost: alt.free.newsservers, news.software.readers   
   From: address@is.invalid   
      
   Arlen,   
      
   > You might not see this 'cuz a "real" newsreader would likely have emailed   
   > the moderator directly   
      
   Why ?   
      
   Why would the moderator want to receive - and put into a newsgroup - a post   
   which you could not read the responses to ?   
      
   > Paganini *does* carry misc.taxes.moderated   
      
   Oh goodie.  Now all you have to do is to post in that newsgroup and see if   
   you get permission from the moderator.  That is how it works.   
      
   Ofcourse, there is a good chance, if the moderator allows you to post,   
   that, when you post the same crap as you do here, that permission will be   
   revoked rather quickly.   
      
   > How does a NORMAL newsreader handle this fallback to email for moderation?   
      
   :-)   I suggest you first try to determine if such a NORMAL newsreader does   
   indeed offer such a fall-back (it doesn't). *and only it does* try to figure   
   out how its implemented..   
      
   Kiddo, that MODERATOR list is there to allow you to make a moderator aware   
   of *PROBLEMS*.  And yours is not a problem.   
      
   It sounds to me that you have absolutily *zero* idea how a moderated   
   newsgroup works, and, as always, can't be arsed to google for it.   
      
   Regards,   
   Rudy Wieser   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)