From: G6JPG@255soft.uk   
      
   On 2026/2/1 9:54:0, John wrote:   
   > On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 08:07:10 -0000 (UTC), Chris    
   > wrote:   
      
   []   
      
   >> Computers and the like are bulky and difficult to carry. Money and   
   >> jewellery are easy to pocket.   
      
   I'm pretty sure laptops would disappear, though.   
   >   
   >  DVD's and other detritus might have entertainment value. Resale value   
   > could be zero (I don't know, I've never tried to sell any down the   
   > pub) but a thief might find stuff in your collection that he doesn't   
   > have.   
   >   
   >  Whether that's worth risking decades in jail for is a value judgment   
   > only the criminal could make. Me, I'd prefer to make friends with you   
   > and to *borrow* your nice movies. :)   
   >   
   :-)   
   >>   
   >>> Which suggests   
   >>> that they knew there was jewellery present but that's another story.   
   >>   
   >> What house in any decent area doesn't have jewellery?   
   >   
   >  Mine, for one.   
      
   (Mine too.)   
      
   []   
      
   >  My lady was never much for jewels and I'm not entirely a girl so I   
   > don't have many, either.   
   >   
   >  Yes, that's sexist but it's true that girls like shiny, sparkly   
   > stuff. Some of them. Sometimes.   
   >   
   I (male) quite like sparkly things. Not chains, necklaces, or rings, but   
   artfully-assembled collections of sparkly things - such as brooches - I   
   quite like. Though I'm completely unconcerned as to whether they're   
   carbon (or other) crystals, or just Zwarovski glass. Having said that, I   
   don't think I own any such (apart from a little cat brooch I bought my   
   grandma once, and inherited when she died - but not sure where it is.   
   That's Zwarovski or similar, not diamonds).   
   >>   
   >>> (I have a NAS in my hall, and suspect that in the event of burglary it   
   >>> would be ignored. (There are others backing it up elsehere in the   
   >>> house that are not so obvious.))   
   >   
   >  That's the sort of thing *I* might take, were I a burglarry type. Not   
   > for the resale value, which is nil or less, but because it might have   
   > porn, movies or music on it.   
      
   Porn could be used to blackmail you, especially if it's illegal in any   
   way. And while we're touching on the nastier side of burglary, personal   
   details - so they tell us - also have a fenceable value, if you find the   
   right sort of fence: at least things like bank details, possibly   
   commercially confidential information too.   
      
   >   
   >  Once I'd copied off the goodies, I'd probably return it   
   > surreptitiously and unharmed. After all, if *I* found goodies on it   
   > then *you* might miss it and that would be sad.   
      
   :-) Now that's more my kind of burglar!   
      
   >   
   >  I don't think I'd copy off private photos or vids.   
   >   
   >  I'd make a lousy burglar.   
   >   
   >  I'd spend *days* making friends with your dog, cat and plants. :)   
   >   
   >                                                                  J.   
      
   Oh, if there's a cat, I'd be hopeless! Or more or less an animal. I   
   don't _think_ plants, though, though I might tend them. ("No, officer,   
   nothing was taken, but the plants were watered.")   
      
   >   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>   
      
      
   --   
   J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf   
      
   Personally, I don't like the Senate idea, I don't like the idea of   
   having to elect another bunch of overpaid incompetents. I don't like   
   the idea of having wholesale appointments by the PM of the day for   
   domination of the second chamber. I like anachronism. I like the idea   
   of a bunch of unelected congenital idiots getting in the way of a bunch   
   of conmen. - Charles F. Hankel, 1998-3-19.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)