Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-10    |    Steaming pile of horseshit Windows 10    |    197,590 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 197,524 of 197,590    |
|    Paul to R.Wieser    |
|    Re: Do ISPs block port 25?    |
|    23 Feb 26 08:36:13    |
      XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird       From: nospam@needed.invalid              On Mon, 2/23/2026 7:46 AM, R.Wieser wrote:       > Mr. Man-wai Chang,       >       >> ISPs are trying to prevent non-business customers from running their own       >> SMTP server (TCP port 25) to spam the world.       >       > I'm not sure how blocking that port would block spamming, as using the       > equivalent SSL port for it would also work.       >       > AFAICT the usage of SSL connections has the same reason as always : snooping       > gets harder (for one, the users authentication cannot be sniffed anymore).       >       > Though I did hear, long ago, that some ISPs routed the SMTP port connections       > (standard and SSL) only to their own email servers. For the reason you       > described.       >       > Regards,       > Rudy Wieser       >       >              The protocol is blocked by the ISP DPI box. It doesn't even matter       what port you attempt it on, Port 25 closes down just as easily       as Port 1025, if the SMTP protocol is sniffed by the DPI box       examining packet payloads.              At one time, network equipment designers would not look at a payload       for any reason. It was headers-only for analysis and transport. But       today, the DPI box examines whole packets and nothing is sacred :-)               Paul              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca