Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.os.windows-10    |    Steaming pile of horseshit Windows 10    |    197,590 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 197,575 of 197,590    |
|    J. P. Gilliver to R.Wieser    |
|    Re: Do ISPs block port 25?    |
|    24 Feb 26 18:31:19    |
      XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird       From: G6JPG@255soft.uk              On 2026/2/24 15:15:51, R.Wieser wrote:       > John,       >       >> however, they've not _obliged_ their users to use Greenly even       >> initially.       >       > I was thinking about Paul's suggested case where a users SMTP traffic was       > not allowed to exit the ISPs area of control. (and the ISP could ofcourse       > control who would be able to run an email server).              I sort of understand - though through a glass darkly, as the saying       goes. (But don't try to enlighten me!)       >       > The idea about forced usage came from something I read some time ago : a       > landlord (of appartment buildings) who dictated which ISP had to be used by       > its renters (which just screamed "kickback!" to me). If I'm not mistaken       > that case has been given to the judges to decide.              Most definitely! That's like telling people they can only watch certain       TV stations!       >       >> Though I get the impression that if users want to retain their PN       >> addresses,       >> they _do_ have to;       >       > That sounds logical : a new email provider with its own domain name means       > that the users emails domain part needs to change too.              Yes, they're sort of subsidiary email addresses. For example, my old       Demon one was |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca