Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.software.seamonkey    |    Not a bad little Mozilla fork    |    9,710 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,918 of 9,710    |
|    Don Vito Martinelli to frg    |
|    Re: Sharing a profile between Windows an    |
|    14 Jul 25 21:52:19    |
      From: hyperspace.flyover@vogon.gov.invalid              frg wrote:       > alexyu wrote:       >> Don Vito Martinelli wrote, on 13 Jul 2025 14:23:       >>       >>> Rather amusingly, I discovered a document from 18 years ago detailing       >>> how to do this:       >>> https://sillydog.org/netscape/kb/linuxwindows.html       >>>       >>> Nowadays Frank (FRG) has stated repeatedly here that this is a very       >>> dangerous thing to do, and that various fields in the profile are       >>> incompatible between the two operating systems.       >>> I don't know about abook.mab, but bookmarks.html ceased to be       >>> relevant many years ago.       >>       >> Since before 2020, I've been running SM 2.49.5 and FF ESR 52.9 in a       >> WinXP/Win7x32/Win7x64) multi-boot system, using the same XUL       >> extensions and basic profile files, and copying 'places', cookies,       >> logins, etc. from one to the other SM to FF) to keep them all in sync,       >> with the SM & FF Profiles in special root directories in W7, used by       >> both OS's, and it had been working fine.       >>       >> Frank (frg) also warned me of possible problems, but there have been       >> none, even after I added the W7x64, so it seems that the internal       >> adjustments (by SM/FF & Win) are able to automatically make any needed       >> adjustments when using the Profiles in different OS's. I don't use       >> Linux (yet?), but I suspect that, in that case, the differences might       >> create problems, since there is no 'overseer' over Win & Linux...       >>       >> Of course, if I ever decide to upgrade SM to 2.53 and/or FF to the       >> latest versions, they would be inherently incompatible, and this setup       >> would no longer work; but, since my main interest here is SM for       >> mail/news, and SM 2.49 and FF 52 as 'alternate browsers' (to MS Edge,       >> which is locked to v.104 due to W7, but handles most sites which the       >> old SM/FF cannot), that isn't on the near horizon.       >>       >       > content prefs (download paths) and ics calendar files are among the       > problematic ones. If you don't run mail oder use Lightning you might not       > notice. Some extensions are also problematics. In any case you are on       > your own with problems.       >       > FRG       >       >              When you say "if you don't run mail", does that include Newsgroups?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca