Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.software.seamonkey    |    Not a bad little Mozilla fork    |    9,725 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,925 of 9,725    |
|    Daniel70 to alexyu    |
|    Re: Sharing a profile between Windows an    |
|    16 Jul 25 19:10:58    |
      From: daniel47@eternal-september.org              On 16/07/2025 8:34 am, alexyu wrote:       > Daniel70 wrote, on 15 j]Jul 2025 09:38:       >       > > On 15/07/2025 8:15 pm, Don Vito Martinelli wrote:       > >> Daniel70 wrote:       > >>> I'm betting that if you were to look at the relevant file (with a       > Text Editor), you would see that it lists a double setting of File       > Locations, one set to display the Windows formatted copies (i.e.       > C:\SeaMonkey\Profiles\addressbook) and a similar (but different) set of       > Linux formatted copies(i.e. Home/SeaMonkey/Profiles/addressbook).       > >>>       > >>       > >> Unlikely, where would the "foreign OS" values come from? They       > should also be visible in about:config and I've seen no signs of that.       > >       > > When you set up your Windows SeaMonkey profile, the Windows-styled       > addresses of associated files would be placed in the Config file (or       > whatever).       > >       > > Then, when you set up your Linux SeaMonkey profile (with it pointing       > towards the Windows Profile), the Linux styled addresses of associated       > LINUX files would also be placed in the SAME Config file.       > >       > > At least this WAS the case for my Laptop where I had set up the Linux       > SeaMonkey pointing to the Windows Profile. My thoughts might change when       > I set up Linux and Linux SeaMonkey on this Desktop.       >       > This very probably is at least part of the 'SM programming mechanisms'       > which allow the behavior I described: Yes, the profile-definition files       > do have in them addresses for all of the Windows versions I use       > (XP,7-32,7-64--no Linux), and hopefully these are added whenever       > relevant (depending on the Win version being used), and the programs       > 'know/discover' which version is most apt for each session.       >       > Very possibly, that flexibility does not extend to Linux-Windows combos,       > so that might be why they are much more dangerous...       >       As I recall they would be on seperate lines, one under the other, so if       it works (safely) one way, it should work (safely) the other way.              IMHO, for what it's worth. ;-P       --       Daniel70              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca