From: dave.r.yeo@gmail.com   
      
   Daniel70 wrote:   
   > On 26/07/2025 6:39 am, Geoff Welsh wrote:   
   >> Daniel70 wrote on 7/25/25 3:45 AM:   
   >>> On 25/07/2025 7:23 am, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>> Geoff Welsh  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>    
   >>>   
   >>>>> I honestly can't even remember how I set any of this stuff up, so "it"   
   >>>>> suddenly breaking is quite worrisome.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If you wish to post in the Seamonkey newsgroup, then discuss Seamonkey.   
   >>>> If it's just a test article, then post in a *.test newsgroup.   
   >>>>   
   >>> Correct. Several times I have suggested, rather than posting a 'Test'   
   >>> post to a supposedly 'active' newsgroup, try posting a question that   
   >>> would be "On Topic" for that newsgroup .... e.g. for this SeaMonkey   
   >>> newsgroup, rather than posting a "Test" post, make a post along the   
   >>> lines of ......   
   >>>   
   >>> "SeaMonkey is currently at Ver 2.53.21. When will SeaMonkey release   
   >>> Ver 3.01??"   
   >>   
   >> Hmmm.  So invent a fake question?   
   >   
   > "fake"!! 'fake'!! I really thought when the Devs improved on V 2.49,   
   > they might jump to 3.0 .... but, I guess the small team working   
   > improving on SM are just too Snowed under to bother with such piffling   
   > little things!! ;-P   
   >   
   > Thank you, Dev Team, Thank you!! ;-)   
      
   All the updates seem to be incremental leading to the minor point   
   updates. 3.x would imply a major update to the core, which with the   
   developers being limited may well never happen.   
   I like that SM is fairly stable in features and looks. I recently ran   
   SeaMonkey 1.x (forget the version, it was the last 1.x) and wow, was it   
   a different experience.   
   Dave   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)