Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.software.seamonkey    |    Not a bad little Mozilla fork    |    9,710 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,015 of 9,710    |
|    bey24thgfdhg to Mark Bourne    |
|    Re: Setting default sort order for mail     |
|    17 Aug 25 12:49:22    |
      From: agents@meddatainc.com              Mark Bourne wrote:       > bey24thgfdhg wrote:       >> Running seamonkey 2.53.20 under Linux. Is it possible to set the default       sort order for all mail folders? It defaults to ascending, ie. the newest       emails at the bottom, whereas I prefer descending, ie., the newest at the top.       (I have ca 20 mail        accounts and would thus prefer not have to do it manually for each mail       account folder...)       >       > Mine seems to sort with new messages at the top by default. I don't recall       doing anything specifically to do that, but I do see a couple of       relevant-looking settings in about:config that show as having been changed       from their defaults - so presumably        I have changed them at some time:       > - mailnews.default_news_sort_order = 2       > - mailnews.default_sort_order = 2       >       > I'm guessing "2" means descending order.       >       > There are also corresponding "sort_type" settings:       > - mailnews.default_news_sort_type = 21       > - mailnews.default_sort_type = 18       >       > I'm guessing those control which field it sorts on. Although those are set       to different values, mail and news both sort on date for me, so presumably       mail and news just use different numbers for the same named columns (there are       probably some extra        fields in news that aren't in mail). Both those are showing as being set to       their default values, so doesn't look like I've changed them.       >       > I also have mail.delete_matches_sort_order = true showing as changed. I'm       not certain what that one does, but I recall changing something so that       deleting a message moves the selection to the next newest message (up when       sorted descending, down when        ascending), instead of always moving down regardless of sort order (which       would be the next oldest when sorted in descending order) - so that might have       been it.       >              Thank you, I have made the changes you suggested!              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca