Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.software.seamonkey    |    Not a bad little Mozilla fork    |    9,710 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,631 of 9,710    |
|    Paul B. Gallagher to Brian Schrimpp    |
|    Re: Another "security" feature that SM c    |
|    11 Jan 26 12:45:02    |
      From: mozilla@pbg-translations.com              Brian Schrimpp wrote:       > Paul B. Gallagher wrote:       >> Brian Schrimpp wrote:       >>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:       >>>       >>>> Either way, the putative purpose of the captcha is to test whether       >>>> I'm a human being, and even when I prove that I am, they reject me.       >>>> As soon as I switch to another browser, I pass. So it's not my       >>>> network, it's my SeaMonkey that they're rejecting.       >>>       >>> Your SeaMonkey 2.53.22 is based on a much older version of Firefox       >>> and does not support newer JavaScript features. When a CAPTCHA uses       >>> those newer features, the CAPTCHA may respond as if JavaScript is not       >>> working properly (line 2 of the "reasons may include" above).       >>>       >>>>>> My theory is they didn't like my user agent string.       >>>       >>> You could try this theory out by changing the user-agent string       >>> (about:config preference general.useragent.override).       >>       >> OK, I know how to do that and have done so for several sites. But       >> which site do I lie to for this purpose? cbo.gov (the site I'm trying       >> to view, which reports the block), or |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca