Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.software.seamonkey    |    Not a bad little Mozilla fork    |    9,710 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,639 of 9,710    |
|    Daniel70 to Paul B. Gallagher    |
|    Re: Another "security" feature that SM c    |
|    12 Jan 26 20:05:50    |
      From: daniel47@nomail.afraid.org              On 12/01/2026 4:45 am, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:       > Brian Schrimpp wrote:       >> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:       >>> Brian Schrimpp wrote:       >>>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:       >>>>       >>>>> Either way, the putative purpose of the captcha is to test whether       >>>>> I'm a human being, and even when I prove that I am, they reject me.       >>>>> As soon as I switch to another browser, I pass. So it's not my       >>>>> network, it's my SeaMonkey that they're rejecting.       >>>>       >>>> Your SeaMonkey 2.53.22 is based on a much older version of Firefox       >>>> and does not support newer JavaScript features. When a CAPTCHA uses       >>>> those newer features, the CAPTCHA may respond as if JavaScript is       >>>> not working properly (line 2 of the "reasons may include" above).       >>>>       >>>>>>> My theory is they didn't like my user agent string.       >>>>       >>>> You could try this theory out by changing the user-agent string       >>>> (about:config preference general.useragent.override).       >>>       >>> OK, I know how to do that and have done so for several sites. But       >>> which site do I lie to for this purpose? cbo.gov (the site I'm trying       >>> to view, which reports the block), or |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca