Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.freeware    |    Generic free software discussions    |    39,988 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 38,583 of 39,988    |
|    Paul to Mark Lloyd    |
|    Re: Alarm that rings on the PC at 8am to    |
|    12 Jun 25 16:41:24    |
      XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10       From: nospam@needed.invalid              On Thu, 6/12/2025 11:47 AM, Mark Lloyd wrote:       > On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 00:53:19 -0400, Paul wrote:       >       > [snip\       >       >> In the area I live in, 300,000 people receive a B12 shot every month.       >> Just, ridiculous. The news article about it was asking whether this was       >> "reasonable" or not.       >> You know at least a few of them (like me), could be on the pills       >> instead. But the doctors just don't have the time to be pissing around       >> with this stuff. The topic is handled poorly.       >       > I have heard that for B12, a daily pill is better than a monthly shot.              That advice is only to take the load off the medical system.              Pills are likely to cost more, to you, than a vial every 10 months.       It depends on who pays for the administration of the shot, whether       the injection method is cheaper. The chemical costs $1. The nurse       costs $25.              When I was receiving shots, a nurse can't give that shot, without       doctor approval for each and every one. If the doctor is handling       a patient, they are not interrupted by nursey while they work.       Between patients, they're giving permission for shots.              The vial itself (you buy the vial, clinic does not provide),       is likely cheaper than the pills. And, the shot is just as       effective. The reason for this, is your liver stores B12,       and the tau is 30 days. That means 36% of your reserve is used       up (drooping in the supply), when your shot comes along to boost       it back up. If you waited three months, had no pills or shot and       ate potato chips the whole time, now you're in trouble.       But from month to month, a 1 ml shot is sufficient to last       you for the whole month. Cyanocobalamine.              The body recycles B12. It removes B12 you would piss out,       and sends it back to the liver. This is why the supply       lasts so long. There is scavenging. This is a trace chemical.       Evolution has provided us with survival mechanisms, for the       essential trace chemical. The biochemical process       is ridiculous as a design, but it works... sorta.       When that process breaks down, that's when the needle comes out.              The biochemical process, does not process more than 2x to 3x of the       RDA. This is why overdoing it, is pointless. If you ate canned       clams, now you're pissing out the excess B12, because the       process doesn't have the bandwidth for the whole load. Whereas,       when you receive a shot into the blood stream, the inefficient       "gut transport" thing does not apply. And the liver is very       good as filters go. The liver can absorb a whole months       worth of chemical, sucking it out of the blood stream after       your shot. Neat. That's the difference between blood       and gut.              But we really shouldn't have 300,000 people receiving       those shots. That betrays a flawed Medical Society flow chart       for treatment. The doctor should interact with you, tip you upright,       keep you self sufficient. Turning everyone into a pin cushion       when it was not actually needed, is wrong.              This has happened with other meds. A person will discover, one       way or another, that the med they've been consuming, isn't       actually needed. And another doctor can then test and verify       that their vitals indicate continued consumption is not required.       This is one reason, a pharmacist will sometimes review a customer       meds, when more than three meds are prescribed by one or more       doctors. There is a possibility of over-medication, and the       pharmacist may start asking you questions whether you know       what these are for, and has anyone during renewal asked the       right questions.              That's how I got off the needle. A female doctor said she wasn't       going to allow the nurse to give me my shot. I had to fend       for myself, use adhoc techniques. I switched to pills. I       ordered the blood test to verify I was "still good" after       three months. There was no further interaction with the       female doctor, no followup, just "no, I'm not giving you       this shot today". I was expected to work this out for myself.              One of my doctors (an author who writes for the newspaper),       asks people why we hate doctors. We don't hate doctors.       But, they are an acquired taste. Like a vintage vinegar.               Paul              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca