Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.comp.freeware    |    Generic free software discussions    |    39,988 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 38,848 of 39,988    |
|    David B. to Dustin    |
|    The truth WILL out! (was - "Why haven't     |
|    12 Aug 25 12:53:52    |
      XPost: alt.computer.workshop       From: BD@hotmail.co.uk              On 30/08/2011 18:22, Dustin wrote:       > ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.com> wrote in       > news:kPadnT3nvtXVC87TnZ2dnUVZ8hidnZ2d@bt.com:       >       >> No, I'm not. Neither of you has said *why* you left service AFAICR       >       > I've told you, David has told you. If those reasons aren't good enough,       > take your index finger and stick it right up your ass. As far as you       > can push it. Better yet, take that illegal firearm you have, ram it up       > your ass and freely pull the trigger. Please do ensure it has a live       > round in the chamber prior to doing so. You can see your son sooner,       > that way. eh?       >       >> Perhaps you should ask him again.       >       > I have no need to do so. Tony wasn't *ever* on the paid staff. You did       > just as I described. Took what he said, rewrote it and tried to pass it       > off as from him, semi hiding his identity; then "leaking" it accidently       > a little while later. Fact is, you lied. You don't know anything about       > why we left other than what you claimed (and got caught lying about)       > that he told you. Another fact is, Tony wouldn't ever be in any       > position with enough clearance to even have a clue about the internals       > of malwarebytes or any other company.       >       >> I have no dispute with that part, but it is only a part.       >       > You can't dispute it David, I've already seen the correspondence. You       > tried to butter him up, as you did with me, and when you finally posed       > your questions about David and myself; that's what you got in response.       > NOT what you've been claiming.       >       >> 'He' learned more about *you* though! No email passed between us by       >       > You're one of the people I was refering to when I said "lemmings". :)       > You have nothing on me, know very little about me, and it's going to       > stay that way. OTH, I know all kinds of things about you. Didn't plan       > for things to work out that way I bet... did you? :)       >       >> Security'. With your skills you can no doubt have a look and see       >       > Don't need too. I simply asked Tony what was up. See stupid, Tony and I       > are long time associates. He showed me the PM's. I'm calling you out,       > as I know you're a liar.       >       >> Failing that, email me and I might just send you a screenshot to       >> demonstrate that I *have* told you the truth. That will be on the       >       > You haven't told the truth about any of this. Tony didn't tell you that       > malwarebytes was unhappy with my work or Davids. As that isn't the       > truth and never was. My IT skills and knowledge has never been       > questioned. Factoid for you, malwarebytes uses technology I gave them;       > it didn't exist prior to me and it likely wouldn't have still for       > sometime. They *still* use it. I must not have been that bad. [g]       >       >> understanding that what passes between us remains private. Your       >> call.       >       > If I want to call you, I will. If I want to write you a letter, I will.       > If I want to drop by, I certainly will. I don't trust you, you provide       > no reason to trust you, you have provided reasons to mistrust you.       >       > You will go so far as to lie on me to extract information. You will try       > to defame me to extract information. You did try to provide a street       > level view of my house complete with a RL address inviting discussion       > on it. (I'm *really tempted* to repay that with yours, I'm seriously       > thinking about doing that for you David.)       >       >> Both you and David Lipman read more into the post than you should       >> have done. |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca