XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.british, alt.conspiracy.princess-diana
XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.america
XPost: us.politics
From: oO@oO.com
"Clough" wrote in message
news:lron021hrvtktip6v5mkl369to5brq21mh@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 22:16:01 -0000, "oO" wrote:
>
>>Then why ask 'even bigger than the Americunts' then answer 'I doubt it'...
>
> Because even if the Venezuelans can field two million men against one
> hundred thousand Americunts, then the Americunts would easily win in a
> head on confrontation. This is because of the Americunts overwhelming
> firepower and technology.
>
> Grunts on the ground are not the only, or even most important, part of
> the equation. The Venezuelans may well be superior numerically, but
> the Americunts are superior technologically, and it is technology that
> matters in conventional warfare. Which is why the Americunts should
> never be fought conventionally. Fortunatly they are vulnerable to
> asymmetric warfare.
Thanks for the clarification. You are right.
>>> If millions of Venezuelan troops meet thousands of Americunts head on,
>>> the Venezuelans will not stand a chance.
>
>>Really? Why is that? I seem to remember people thinking the same thing
>>about
>>US troops in Viet Nam.
>
> If the Vietcong had met the Americunts head on in a conventional
> conflict, the war would have ended quickly in an Americunt victory.
>
> It is only because the Vietcong were masters of asymmetric warfare
> that they could give the Americunts a much deserved ass kicking and
> drive the bastards out of their country.
>
>>> I hope the Venezuelans know this.
>
>>I'm sure they are pretty clued up on military strategy.
>
> Yes, I would think so.
>
>>> If they do, they can defeat the Americunts and keep Venezuela free.
>
>>Lets hope so.
>
> Exactly.
>
> Clough
>
>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
