XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.british, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.america, us.politics   
   From: 7won-t15h@dea.spamcon.org   
      
   mimus wrote:   
   > On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:27:49 +0100, hummingbird wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:29:20 -0500, mimus    
   >>  mysteriously appeared thru the usenet mist to inform us thus...   
   >>   
   >>> Not to mention DHS Secretary Chertoff, who sees nothing wrong with Dubai   
   >>> and China overseeing port security here.   
   >> Except that in the ports deal, Dubai would never have been overseeing   
   >> security.   
   >   
   > Really? so it'd be fine, no danger to security at all, to have, say, Iran   
   > or Pakistan or North Korea run the ports?   
   >   
   > I think we should sell the ports of Houston and San Diego to the Mexican   
   > government-- I'm sure that'd be no danger to the immigration and smuggling   
   > laws.   
   >   
      
   Do you say that Britain has been responsible for the security of some US   
   ports in recent years, then?   
      
   Steve   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)