Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.america-at-war    |    Debating how war is good for business    |    4,706 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,942 of 4,706    |
|    oO to All    |
|    The Way Americans Like Their War    |
|    04 Jun 06 20:50:18    |
      XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.british, alt.conspiracy.princess-diana       XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.america       XPost: us.politics       From: oO@oO.com              Published on Saturday, June 3, 2006 by the Seattle Post-Intelligencer       The Way Americans Like Their War       by Robert Fisk              Could Haditha be just the tip of the mass grave?              The corpses we have glimpsed, the grainy footage of the cadavers and the       dead children; could these be just a few of many? Does the handiwork of the       United States' army of the slums go further?              I remember clearly the first suspicions I had that murder most foul might be       taking place in our name in Iraq. I was in the Baghdad mortuary, counting       corpses, when one of the city's senior medical officials, an old friend,       told me of his fears. "Everyone brings bodies here," he said. "But when the       Americans bring bodies in, we are instructed that under no circumstances are       we ever to do post-mortems. We were given to understand that this had       already been done. Sometimes we'd get a piece of paper like this one with a       body." And here the man handed me a U.S. military document showing with the       hand-drawn outline of a man's body and the words "trauma wounds."              What kind of trauma is now being experienced in Iraq? Just who is doing the       mass killing? Who is dumping so many bodies on garbage heaps? After Haditha,       we are going to reshape our suspicions.              It's no good saying "a few bad apples." All occupation armies are corrupted.       But do they all commit war crimes? The Algerians are still uncovering the       mass graves left by the French paras who liquidated whole villages. We know       of the rapist-killers of the Russian army in Chechnya.              We have all heard of Bloody Sunday. The Israelis sat and watched while their       proxy Lebanese militia butchered and eviscerated its way through 1,700       Palestinians. And of course the words My Lai are now uttered again. Yes, the       Nazis were much worse. And the Japanese. And the Croatian Ustashi. But this       is us. This is our army. These young soldiers are our representatives in       Iraq. And they have innocent blood on their hands.              I suspect part of the problem is that we never really cared about Iraqis,       which is why we refused to count their dead. Once the Iraqis turned upon the       army of occupation with their roadside bombs and suicide cars, they became       Arab "gooks," the evil sub-humans whom the Americans once identified in       Vietnam. Get a president to tell us that we are fighting evil and one day we       will wake to find that a child has horns, a baby has cloven feet.              Remind yourself these people are Muslims and they can all become little       Mohamed Attas. Killing a roomful of civilians is only a step further from       all those promiscuous air strikes that we are told kill 'terrorists" but       which all too often turn out to be a wedding party or -- as in       Afghanistan -- a mixture of "terrorists" and children or, as we are soon to       hear, no doubt, "terrorist children."              In a way, we reporters are also to blame. Unable to venture outside       Baghdad -- or around Baghdad itself -- Iraq's vastness has fallen under a       thick, all-consuming shadow. We might occasionally notice sparks in the       night -- a Haditha or two in the desert -- but we remain meekly cataloguing       the numbers of "terrorists" supposedly scored in remote corners of       Mesopotamia. For fear of the insurgent's knife, we can no longer       investigate. And the Americans like it that way.              I think it becomes a habit, this sort of thing. Already the horrors of Abu       Ghraib are shrugged away. It was abuse, not torture. And then up pops a       junior officer in the United States charged for killing an Iraqi army       general by stuffing him upside down in a sleeping bag and sitting on his       chest. And again, it gets few headlines. Who cares if another Iraqi bites       the dust? Aren't they trying to kill our boys who are out there fighting       terror.              For who can be held to account when we regard ourselves as the brightest,       the most honorable of creatures, doing endless battle with the killers of       Sept. 11 or July 7 because we love our country and our people -- but not       other people -- so much. And so we dress ourselves up as Galahads, yes as       Crusaders, and we tell those whose countries we invade that we are going to       bring them democracy. I can't help wondering today how many of the innocents       slaughtered in Haditha took the opportunity to vote in the Iraqi       elections -- before their "liberators" murdered them.              Robert Fisk writes for the Independent, published in Great Britain.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca