XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.conspiracy.princess-diana, uk.curre   
   t-events.terrorism   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.politics.british   
   XPost: uk.local.london, uk.media, uk.transport   
   From: oO@oO.com   
      
   "John D Salt"  wrote in message   
   news:Xns97FEEED497CC8BaldHeadedJohn@216.196.109.145...   
   > "oO"  wrote in news:4hlaofF5dupU1@individual.net:   
   >   
   >> How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps   
   >>   
   >> Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 13 2005   
   > [Snips]   
   >> Such reports should not be dismissed on the basis that they come from   
   >> unnamed sources and did not reach mainstream coverage.   
   >   
   > No, they should be dismissed on the basis that they come from a known   
   > fruitcake   
   > conspiracist who wouldn't recognise the truth if it bit him very hard in   
   > the   
   > arse.   
      
   How very sneaky. You have snipped the contents of two articles to make part   
   of a sentence (from the J7 site ) appear as if it relates to the Prison   
   Planet article. Added to this you only quote one line - in an attempt to   
   take the post completely out of context.   
      
   The full quote from the J7 site   
   http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-mind-the-gaps-part-1.html website was:   
      
   "Such reports should not be dismissed on the basis that they come from   
   unnamed sources and did not reach mainstream coverage. An inordinate amount   
   of press coverage regarding the attacks of July 7th involved information   
   from 'sources' which were not named, yet are judged to be authentic in that   
   capacity. Such reports should surely be investigated, even if only to   
   discover that they had no basis in truth, rather than simply ignored by the   
   media."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)