XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.conspiracy.princess-diana, uk.curre   
   t-events.terrorism   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.politics.british   
   XPost: uk.local.london, uk.media, uk.transport   
   From: jsspratley@yahoo.com   
      
   On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 06:41:41 -0500, John D Salt   
    wrote:   
      
   >hummingbird  wrote in   
   >news:ml8cb2he8qms4hjrckf3s7feckiijut7lv@4ax.com:   
   >   
   >[Snips]   
   >> I thought for one moment that you were going to provide some thorough   
   >> line x line debunking of the issues raised on that website.   
   >> Too bad you didn't. Is it because the issues do not have *official   
   >> explanations* which you would find acceptable?   
   >   
   >No, it's because I know from past experience that line-by-line refutation   
   >of this sort of thing is not merely pointless, but actually counter-   
   >productive in that it invests the accusations with a spurious   
   >respectability.   
   >   
   >All the best,   
   >   
   >John.   
      
   So if, as you obviously wish, we accept your point of view, then that   
   is just another instance of letting others think for us.   
      
   No thanks. No sale, Mr. Salt.   
      
   A conspiracy is a conspiracy. Whether this is just yet another, we   
   shall have to wait and see. But looking at the present disgusting   
   world events and the other evident behaviour of the suggested   
   protagonists, we shouldn't be too surprised if it is.   
      
   Even in Britain? Yes, I'm afraid this is what even Britain has become   
   in the hands of those it has had the misfortune to harbour.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)