XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.conspiracy.princess-diana, uk.curre   
   t-events.terrorism   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.politics.british   
   XPost: uk.local.london, uk.media, uk.transport   
      
   hummingbird  wrote in   
   news:vrjcb2lhgts00a24g9toe4k44mmhat0jv1@4ax.com:   
      
   > On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 06:41:41 -0500  'John D Salt'   
   > posted this onto uk.politics.misc:   
   [Snips]   
   >>No, it's because I know from past experience that line-by-line   
   >>refutation of this sort of thing is not merely pointless, but actually   
   >>counter- productive in that it invests the accusations with a spurious   
   >>respectability.   
   >   
   > I'll take that as an admission that you can't debunk.   
      
   You can take it that way if you like, but it's not what I said, it's not   
   what I meant, and it's not true.  If your reading skills are so weak that   
   they make you leap to fatuous conclusions, that is entirely your problem,   
   and doesn't worry me in the least.   
      
   > The term 'cognitive dissonance' comes to mind.   
      
   Yup, it certainly does.   
      
   All the best,   
      
   John.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)