Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.america-at-war    |    Debating how war is good for business    |    4,706 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,070 of 4,706    |
|    Vandar to All    |
|    Re: The High Cost of Being Poor    |
|    24 Jul 06 22:30:13    |
      XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.british, alt.conspiracy.princess-diana       XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.america       XPost: us.politics       From: vandar69@yahoo.com              oO wrote:       > The High Cost of Being Poor       >       > By Barbara Ehrenreich, AlterNet. Posted July 21, 2006.       >       > From food prices to auto insurance, when did poverty get so expensive?       >       > There are people, concentrated in the Hamptons and Beverly Hills, who still       > confuse poverty with the simple life. No cable TV, no altercations with the       > maid, no summer home maintenance issues -- just the basics like family,       > sunsets and walks in the park. What they don't know is that it's expensive       > to be poor.       >       > In fact, you, the reader of middling income, could probably not afford it. A       > new study from the Brookings Institute documents the "ghetto tax," or higher       > cost of living in low-income urban neighborhoods. It comes at you from every       > direction, from food prices to auto insurance. A few examples from this       > study, by Matt Fellowes, that covered 12 American cities:       >       >       > a.. Poor people are less likely to have bank accounts, which can be       > expensive for those with low balances, and so they tend to cash their pay       > checks at check-cashing businesses, which in the cities surveyed, charged $5       > to $50 for a $500 check.              If they're poor, they don't have $500 checks to cash.              > b.. Nationwide, low-income car buyers, defined as people earning less than       > $30,000 a year, pay two percentage points more for a car loan than more       > affluent buyers.              Poor people don't buy new cars. They buy jinkers from "old man Joe" down       the street for $250              > c.. Low-income drivers pay more for car insurance. In New York, Baltimore       > and Hartford, they pay an average $400 more a year to insure the exact same       > car and driver risk than wealthier drivers.              Bullshit. My auto insurance company has no clue whatsoever how much       money I make. It's none of their business and they don't have a right to       know.              > d.. Poorer people pay an average of one percentage point more in mortgage       > interest.              Poor people don't have mortgages.              > e.. They are more likely to buy their furniture and appliances through       > pricey rent-to-own businesses. In Wisconsin, the study reports, a $200       > rent-to-own TV set can cost $700 with the interest included.              Where does this guy get this shit from? Poor people don't buy their       furniture and appliances through rent-to-own stores, they buy it (or       have it given to them) from someone in the next building or the       occassional yard sale.              > f.. They are less likely to have access to large supermarkets and hence to       > rely on the far more expensive, and lower quality offerings, of small       > grocery and convenience stores.              What? Less likely to have access to large supermarkets!?       Do the automatic doors not open for the poor?              > I didn't live in any ghettoes when I worked on Nickle and Dimed --a trailer       > park, yes, but no ghetto -- and on my average wage of $7 an hour, or about       > $14,400 a year, I wasn't in the market for furniture, a house or a car.              Which means the above analysis is crap.              > But       > the high cost of poverty was brought home to me within a few days of my       > entry into the low-wage life, when, slipping into social-worker mode, I       > chastised a co-worker for living in a motel room when it would be so much       > cheaper to rent an apartment. Her response: Where would she get the first       > month's rent and security deposit it takes to pin down an apartment? The       > lack of that amount of capital -- probably well over $1,000 -- condemned her       > to paying $40 a night at the Day's Inn.              There are myriad places to get the initial capital. Tell her to get off       her ass and find it.              > Then there was the problem of sustenance. I had gone into the project       > imagining myself preparing vast quantities of cheap, nutritious soups and       > stews, which I would freeze and heat for dinner each day. But surprise: I       > didn't have the proverbial pot to pee in, not to mention spices or       > Tupperware. A scouting trip to K-Mart established that it would take about a       > $40 capital investment to get my kitchenette up to speed for the low-wage       > way of life.       >       > The food situation got only more challenging when I, too, found myself       > living in a motel. Lacking a fridge and microwave, all my food had to come       > from the nearest convenience store (hardboiled eggs and banana for       > breakfast) or, for the big meal of the day, Wendy's or KFC. I have no       > nutritional complaints; after all, there is a veggie, or flecks of one, in       > Wendy's broccoli and cheese baked potato. The problem was financial. A       > double cheeseburger and fries is lot more expensive than that hypothetical       > homemade lentil stew.       >       > There are other tolls along the road well-traveled by the working poor. If       > your credit is lousy, which it is likely to be, you'll pay a higher deposit       > for a phone. If you don't have health insurance, you may end taking that       > feverish child to an emergency room, and please don't think of ER's as       > socialized medicine for the poor. The average cost of a visit is over       > $1,000, which is over ten times more than what a clinic pediatrician would       > charge.              And wherever they get the $1000 to pay that bill is where they can get       the cash for security on an apartment.              > Or you neglect that hypertension, diabetes or mystery lump until you       > end up with a $100,000 problem on your hands.       >       > So let's have a little less talk about how the poor should learn to manage       > their money, and a little more attention to all the ways that money is being       > systematically siphoned off. Yes, certain kinds of advice would be helpful:       > skip the pay-day loans and rent-to-pay furniture, for example. But we need       > laws in more states to stop predatory practices like $50 charges for check       > cashing.              Bullshit. Business is business. No one is forcing them to cash their       checks there. Open a bank account.              > Also, think what some microcredit could do to move families from       > motels and shelters to apartments. And did I mention a living wage?       >       > If you're rich, you might want to stay that way. It's a whole lot cheaper       > than being poor.              What a load of crap.              > Barbara Ehrenreich is the author of 13 books, most recently "Bait and       > Switch: The (Futile) Pursuit of the American Dream." This piece first       > appeared on her blog.              Internet access? I thought she was poor?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca