home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.america-at-war      Debating how war is good for business      4,706 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,171 of 4,706   
   agent86@justicespammail.com to sstevelp@aol.com   
   Re: The implausibility of the explosives   
   18 Aug 06 17:26:06   
   
   XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.british, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: us.politics   
      
   On 18 Aug 2006 03:26:29 -0700, sstevelp@aol.com wrote:   
      
   >   
   >John P. wrote:   
   >>  wrote in a message   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> >> I think you underestimate the stupidity of criminals. Our prisons are   
   >> >> full   
   >> >> of people who spent a lot of time coming up with a plan that couldn't   
   >> >> fail.   
   >>   
   >> > I think you over estimate the honesty and decency of our leading   
   >> > politicians.   
   >>   
   >> Not at all. I wouldn't trust a politician as far as I could throw him.   
   >>   
   >> > European and American history are full of false flag operations usualy   
   >> > used to achieve political aims that would otherwise be unaccepable to   
   >> > most people.   
   >>   
   >> Yup. ... but there is no evidence that 9/11 was one of them.   
   >   
   >But there is! It is now accepted fact that there were multiple   
   >exercises on that day   
      
   Yep, but that's quite common.   
      
   >involving fake hijacks   
      
   Nope, at least not on the east coast.   
      
   >as well as exercises that reduced normal air cover over   
   >the eastern US   
      
   Nope, the "air cover" over the eastern United States was the same as   
   it had been for several years.  Two alert aircraft at Otis and two   
   alert aircraft at Langley.  That's all there was.   
      
   >involving a hypothetical Russian attack over Alaska.   
      
   Nope.   
      
   >If   
   >the "hijackers" had chosen any other day it is far more probable they   
   >would have been intercepted.   
      
   Not at all.   
      
   >We now know for sure that Senior Norad and Airforce officers lied to   
   >the 911 Kean commission.   
      
   Not really.   
      
   >No satisfactory explanation has been given as to how WTC7 collaped in   
   >six seconds.   
      
   Mostly because it didn't collapse in six seconds.  But then any   
   explanation that will be satisfactory to the engineering community   
   won't be satisfactory to conspiracy wackos.   
      
   >Why did  the Presidents security detail not remove him from a public   
   >event as soon as they knew "America was under attack"? How did they   
   >know he was in no danger?   
      
   Because there were no hijacked aircraft in Florida?   
      
   >Are you aware that most if not all of the "hijackers" were known to the   
   >FBI and had spent time in American military establishments ?   
      
   Nope, they hadn't spent time in American military establishments.   
      
   >There is lots more but any one of those facts could be evidence of a   
   >false flag operation.   
      
   If only any of them were true.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca