home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.america-at-war      Debating how war is good for business      4,706 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,400 of 4,706   
   dearhunter to george   
   Re: more absolute proof that all WTC bui   
   18 Feb 07 00:01:24   
   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.consp   
   racy.antichrist   
   XPost: alt.illuminati   
   From: dearhunter@home.net   
      
   "george"  wrote in   
   news:1171739179.445336.204430@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:   
      
   > On Feb 18, 7:44 am, "John P."   
   >  wrote:   
   >> "oO"  wrote in a message   
   >>   
   >> > The debris has tested positive for products of a THERMATE REACTION.   
   >>   
   >> Actually, none have.   
   >   
   >   
   > That was Jones claim and when thermite was refuted he invented   
   > thermate..   
   >>   
   >> WTC debris tested positive for building materials found in the WTC   
   >> buildings.   
   >>   
   >> > Thermate is an incediary substance used to very quickly slice   
   >> > through thick steel.   
   >   
   > The best way to slice through 'thick' steel is either with a gas axe   
   > or high pressure water and garnite...   
   >>   
   >> Vertically - it will burn through the steel below it. It is also used   
   >> for emergency welding - such as train rail repairs. What is cannot   
   >> do, is cut through steel horizintally, as would be required to slice   
   >> through structural beams.   
   >>   
   >> > It is used together with high explosives in controlled demolitions.   
   >>   
   >> It isn't used in controlled demolitions.   
   >>   
   >> The military uses thermite grenades, most often to destroy equipment   
   >> they are forced to leave behind (such as tanks or communications   
   >> gear).   
   >   
   > And railways use thermite kits to weld railway track...   
   > It certainly couldn't 'cut' through steel framing under load in a   
   > manner that would 'break' it....   
   >   
      
    George, you seem to have all the answers, I have a question for you.   
   Please explain to me how building 7 fell. Please, don't say with fires,   
   better still, don't say with damage to the corner of the building, because,   
   if you answer with one of the above your only going to add to your   
   ignorance. How did that structure fall so perfectly in 4.5 seconds with one   
   simple decision like, pull it? Time for Americans such as yourself to wake   
   up, because if my little 7 year old Grandson who saw the footage of   
   building 7 say too me, Poppa, I saw that on the Discovery Channel,   
   reffering to the controled demolitions they broadcast now & then. If a 7   
   year old mind can relate to that, i'm sure you can also?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca