home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.america-at-war      Debating how war is good for business      4,706 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,424 of 4,706   
   Vandar to All   
   Re: CNN Also Prematurely Reported WTC7 C   
   01 Mar 07 14:40:35   
   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.curre   
   t-events.wtc.bush-knew   
   From: vandar69@yahoo.com   
      
   David Morgan (MAMS) wrote:   
      
   > "DemzRock"  wrote in message news:XuOdnQZD-   
   zVq3vYnZ2dnUVZ_sGqnZ2d@comcast.com...   
   >   
   >>"Animal05"  wrote in message   
   >>news:12ucd6283rdrnaa@corp.supernews.com...   
   >>   
   >>>Bull.   WTC 7's collaspe was predicted from early in the afternoon.   
   >   
   >   
   > Yes, SHILL.....   would you tell us HOW it was even theoretically possible to   
   > predict the perfectly vertical "collapse" of a 47-story tall, steel framed   
   building   
   > which had some damage on the outer surface of one side, and isolated fires   
   > burning on only two floors.... when, never before in history and never since,   
   > has ANY steel framed skyscraper collapsed from fire.  On WHAT knowledge   
   > could *anyone * have * possibly* had the ability to make such anm   
   incomprehensible   
   > PREDICTION.  ???   
      
   Here's something you've been provided a dozen times before. Maybe you   
   should read it this time.   
      
   *******************   
   Firehouse: Other people tell me that there were a lot of firefighters in   
   the street who were visible, and they put out traffic cones to mark them   
   off?   
   Hayden: Yeah. There was enough there and we were marking off. There were   
   a lot of damaged apparatus there that were covered. We tried to get   
   searches in those areas. By now, this is going on into the afternoon,   
   and we were concerned about additional collapse, not only of the   
   Marriott, because there was a good portion of the Marriott still   
   standing, but also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would   
   collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between   
   floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty   
   sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a   
   visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5   
   o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we   
   realized this thing was going to collapse.   
      
   Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away?   
   Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long   
   because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of   
   fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it. That was   
   just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned   
   about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about   
   additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers   
   and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple   
   of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the   
   debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their   
   safety.   
   http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/hayden.html   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca