XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.curre   
   t-events.wtc.bush-knew   
   From: Phatty@Boombatty.com   
      
   On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:11:33 -0600, none@isp.com (Dersu Uzala) wrote:   
      
   >What happened to all the assholes claiming that "it isn't wtc 7" in the BBC   
   >thread of the last two days? They claimed the building shown in the bbc's clip   
   >was another building. Any retractions? Seems their minds don't want to be   
   >confused by facts...who you gonna believe, Dick Cheney or your own lieing   
   >eyes?   
      
   Not to mention they scrambled to insist that it could have also been a   
   "green screen" which, lookin at the lighting and the camera work and   
   location, is completely ridiculous.   
      
   Face it, there's no way they can spin this, and it COMPLETELY   
   corroborates the speil "Lucky" Larry S. spewed about them making the   
   decision to "pull" the building, and then watching it fall.   
      
   Any attempts the "official story konspiracy kooks" make at dismissing   
   this huge smoking gun is an abvious grasping at straws and only makes   
   them look that much more ridiculous.   
      
   The veil is coming down, the truth is coming out, and nothing they can   
   do at this point will stop it.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)