XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.curre   
   t-events.wtc.bush-knew   
   From: vandar69@yahoo.com   
      
   Phatty Boombatty wrote:   
      
   > On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 14:40:35 GMT, Vandar  wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >>David Morgan (MAMS) wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>"DemzRock"  wrote in message news:XuOdnQZD   
   uzVq3vYnZ2dnUVZ_sGqnZ2d@comcast.com...   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>"Animal05"  wrote in message   
   >>>>news:12ucd6283rdrnaa@corp.supernews.com...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>Bull.   WTC 7's collaspe was predicted from early in the afternoon.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>Yes, SHILL.....   would you tell us HOW it was even theoretically possible   
   to   
   >>>predict the perfectly vertical "collapse" of a 47-story tall, steel framed   
   building   
   >>>which had some damage on the outer surface of one side, and isolated fires   
   >>>burning on only two floors.... when, never before in history and never   
   since,   
   >>>has ANY steel framed skyscraper collapsed from fire.  On WHAT knowledge   
   >>>could *anyone * have * possibly* had the ability to make such anm   
   incomprehensible   
   >>>PREDICTION.  ???   
   >>   
   >>Here's something you've been provided a dozen times before. Maybe you   
   >>should read it this time.   
   >>   
   >>*******************   
   >>Firehouse: Other people tell me that there were a lot of firefighters in   
   >>the street who were visible, and they put out traffic cones to mark them   
   >>off?   
   >>Hayden: Yeah. There was enough there and we were marking off. There were   
   >>a lot of damaged apparatus there that were covered. We tried to get   
   >>searches in those areas. By now, this is going on into the afternoon,   
   >>and we were concerned about additional collapse, not only of the   
   >>Marriott, because there was a good portion of the Marriott still   
   >>standing, but also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would   
   >>collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between   
   >>floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty   
   >>sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a   
   >>visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5   
   >>o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we   
   >>realized this thing was going to collapse.   
   >>   
   >>Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away?   
   >>Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long   
   >>because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of   
   >>fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it. That was   
   >>just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned   
   >>about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about   
   >>additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers   
   >>and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple   
   >>of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the   
   >>debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their   
   >>safety.   
   >>http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/hayden.html   
   >   
   >   
   > People = "it"   
      
   Search & rescue effort = "it"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)