XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.curre   
   t-events.wtc.bush-knew   
   From: none@isp.com   
      
   In article ,   
   BDK@twilight-express.com says...   
   >   
   >In article , none@isp.com   
   >says...   
   >> What happened to all the assholes claiming that "it isn't wtc 7" in the BBC   
   >> thread of the last two days? They claimed the building shown in the bbc's   
   clip   
   >> was another building. Any retractions? Seems their minds don't want to be   
   >> confused by facts...who you gonna believe, Dick Cheney or your own lieing   
   >> eyes?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   >WTF does Cheney have to do with anything? The guy couldn't sell me an   
   >air conditioner in hell. It appears the whole thing was just the BBC   
   >being told, or hearing on the police scanner the building was coming   
   >down, and they went with it too soon.   
   >   
   >Hardly earth shattering.   
   >   
   >BDK   
      
   The major point of the original post is that, until recently, many people were   
   denying that the BBC footage actually had the wtc 7 in the background, while   
   at the same time, annoucing its collaspe. Now, with the CNN footage, where the   
   reporter corrects himself, after reporting the collaspe, and the wtc 7 more   
   clearly seen in the background, these people are no longer claiming it is   
   another building, or, it is stock footage shot earlier in the day, and green   
   screen, etc. Whether this new info proves a conspiracy or not, I find it   
   interesting that some folks just categorically state that any conspiracy   
   theories are kooky, and the CT's evidence must be wrong, always.... Except in   
   this case.   
      
   "that's wtc 7!"   
   "no it's not!"   
   "looks like it is!"   
   "can't be, that would support your theory, so it must not be."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)