XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.curre
t-events.wtc.bush-knew
From: findme@m-a-m-s.comC/Odm
"SHOOTER586" wrote in message...
> I have asked several explosives experts and they keep laughing at it.
Apparently you need to ask a building demolition expert, not a fireworks
handler.
> "pull it" was a lame assumption made by Alex Jones
"Pull" has been an industry 'jargon' term used since the days in which the
outer walls were actually pulled down by rope and eventually cables. It is
a term that has stuck to the business of demolishing buildings like the term
'stinks' sticks to a pile of exposed fresh fecal material.
> when he heard them referring to "pulling" WTC 6 with cables.
Bald-faced LIE. The remnants of building 6 were brought to ground level
by the use of demolition teams and explosives, as were all of the remaining
portions of the WTC.
> Who made the decision to "pull it"?
According to Larry Silverstein's lie, a mutual decision between himself (as the
building owner), and the NYFD.... a completely absurd claim. The building
would
have stood, regardless of it's condition, until permits were applied for and
issued,
and the proper planning and safety preparations for it's destruction were made.
That is, of course, unless you're a criminal who has already made the decision
well in advance of the date in question.
> The Fire Department?
At best, the fire department would have been required to be on site in the
event any portion of the future demolition resulted in fires. Otherwise, the
fire department has nothing to do with building demolition outside of the rare
case in which, as an emergency action, walls of roofs of smaller buildings
or homes must be physically destroyed in order to expedite fighting fires.
> Are they in the position to demo a building these days?
No. The Silverstein interview, although a botched admission, was also a lie.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
