XPost: alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.current-events.wtc.bush-knew   
   From: findme@m-a-m-s.comC/Odm   
      
   "SHOOTER586"  wrote in message news:117279   
   037.809911.325340@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...   
   > On Feb 28, 7:38 pm, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)"    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > > Yes, SHILL.....   would you tell us HOW it was even theoretically possible   
   to   
   > > predict the perfectly vertical "collapse" of a 47-story tall, steel framed   
   building   
   > > which had some damage on the outer surface of one side, and isolated fires   
   > > burning on only two floors.... when, never before in history and never   
   since,   
   > > has ANY steel framed skyscraper collapsed from fire.  On WHAT knowledge   
   > > could *anyone * have * possibly* had the ability to make such anm   
   incomprehensible   
   > > PREDICTION.  ???   
   >   
   > Basic understanding of gravity proves things fall downward unless   
   > influenced by an outside lateral force.   
      
   Or supported by massive steel.   
      
   > What was the lateral force?   
      
   Who said anything about lateral force?   
      
   > Isolated fires?   
      
   Given the total cubic footage of the building and it's support structure, the   
   fires and the external damage were insignificant the to overall integrity of   
   the structure..   
      
   > Is this from your 2 pictures from the opposite side of   
   > the buiding's damage?   
      
   What two pictures?   
      
   Are you certain that you know what you're talking about?   
      
   > Who said they were isolated?   
      
   Given the total cubic footage of the building  -it's total volume- the fires   
   were   
   representative of less than 2% of the structure.  This is not rocket science.   
      
   > Biggest fallacy of all.  "Never before in history has a..."   
      
   There is no fallacy to recorded history and fact.  Is there a reason you failed   
   to complete that sentence?   
      
   > I guess you   
   > think the fire crews were lying on-scene when they all thought it was   
   > going to collapse?   
      
   I don't know any more about what the firefighters "on-scene" were talking   
   about than you do... which is nothing.  We do, however, know what the   
   media told us.  Personally, I'm not buying much of that.   
      
   > No really, Alex Jones told me so it must be true.   
      
   Squirrelly nutter, aren't you?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)